DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
648 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
648 KB
Summary
This document is a letter dated February 21, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim explains that attached documents concerning a Motion for a New Trial contain proposed redactions to protect the integrity of an inquiry into 'Juror 50's conduct' and to protect the privacy of other jurors involved in the voir dire process.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Author of the letter representing Ghislaine Maxwell
|
| Alison J. Nathan | United States District Judge |
Recipient of the letter, presiding judge
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of inquiry regarding conduct during voir dire process
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim |
Author's firm
|
|
| United States District Court |
Venue of the case
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (2 events)
February 21, 2022
Unknown (Prior to Feb 21, 2022)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
|
|
Address of United States Courthouse
|
Relationships (2)
Sternheim writes on behalf of the defense in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Case caption and salutation
Key Quotes (3)
"The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50’s conduct during the voir dire process"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #1
"preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #2
"risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,760 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 606 Filed 02/21/22 Page 1 of 1
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
February 21, 2022
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The annexed documents, previously submitted under seal, contain proposed redactions in conformance with the Court’s Orders (Dkt. 596, 605).1
The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50’s conduct during the voir dire process, to ensure juror anonymity and privacy, and to preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported and that the defense proposes to inquire about at any forthcoming hearing.
In an abundance of caution, we have proposed redactions to information and data about the responses of other jurors (selected and prospective) to the jury questionnaire because the questionnaires and sealed portions of the voir dire transcript are not part of the public record. The public disclosure of juror information, even if provided anonymously, risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information.
Very truly yours,
/s/
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
Attachments
cc: Counsel of Record
cc: Counsel of Record
1 The documents - Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion for a New Trial, the Government’s Opposition, and Ms. Maxwell’s Reply - will remain under seal pending the Court’s decision regarding the proposed redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00008975
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document