EFTA00031388.pdf
36.1 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
36.1 KB
Summary
An email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys at the SDNY dated October 22, 2019. The discussion revolves around a civil case opinion where Judge Pauley commented on Epstein's death at the MCC. The sender inquires if the office ever investigated guards involved in a 'serious' 2015 incident at the facility, noting it is still within the statute of limitations.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Made a comment about Epstein's death at MCC which triggered the email chain.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Inmate |
Mentioned regarding his death at MCC.
|
| Redacted Sender | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the initial email inquiring about a 2015 incident involving guards.
|
| Unnamed Guards | Prison Staff |
Involved in a 2015 incident at MCC; subject of inquiry regarding potential investigation.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Employer of the email sender (Assistant United States Attorney).
|
|
| MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center) |
Facility where Epstein died and where the 2015 incident occurred.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the Southern District of New York office.
|
|
|
Prison location mentioned in subject and body.
|
Relationships (1)
AUSA reading opinion/comments from Judge Pauley.
Key Quotes (3)
"Judge Pauley made a comment about Epstein’s death at MCC"Source
EFTA00031388.pdf
Quote #1
"I was wondering if you knew whether our office ever investigated the guards involved in this."Source
EFTA00031388.pdf
Quote #2
"This was a 2015 incident, but it’s still within the statute of limitations, and seems quite serious."Source
EFTA00031388.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,071 characters)
From: [Redacted]
[Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:01:50 +0000
[Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:01:50 +0000
Yep, I'm around.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 1:01 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 1:01 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
That would be great, thanks – can I swing by?
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:59 PM
To: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:59 PM
To: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: RE: MCC case
Will take a look. In the interim, have something else you may be interested in if you have a moment.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 11:[Redacted] AM
To: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: MCC case
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 11:[Redacted] AM
To: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: MCC case
[Redacted],
I just read the attached opinion in a civil case (it came on my radar because Judge Pauley made a comment about Epstein’s death at MCC) – I was wondering if you knew whether our office ever investigated the guards involved in this. This was a 2015 incident, but it’s still within the statute of limitations, and seems quite serious.
I just read the attached opinion in a civil case (it came on my radar because Judge Pauley made a comment about Epstein’s death at MCC) – I was wondering if you knew whether our office ever investigated the guards involved in this. This was a 2015 incident, but it’s still within the statute of limitations, and seems quite serious.
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, NY 10007
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, NY 10007
[Redacted]
EFTA00031388
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document