DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg
380 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
380 KB
Summary
This is the second page of a court order (Document 99) filed on December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the Government to docket redacted documents and exhibits by that same day, ruling that the redactions are narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The document cites legal precedents regarding the presumption of access to judicial documents.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | United States District Judge |
Judge issuing the order
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Entity ordered to docket redacted documents
|
| Third parties | Subjects of privacy |
Individuals whose privacy interests are protecting through redactions
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Southern District of New York (implied by S.D.N.Y. citation and Judge Nathan)
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Source of document (indicated by DOJ-OGR Bates stamp)
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-18
Deadline for the Government to docket redacted documents and corresponding exhibits
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the order was signed
|
Relationships (1)
Judge Nathan orders the Government to docket documents.
Key Quotes (2)
"The Government is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits by no later than December 18, 2020."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg
Quote #1
"Nevertheless, the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties’ personal privacy interests."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (806 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 99 Filed 12/18/20 Page 2 of 2
Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (“Amodeo I”), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the
Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon
v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, the proposed redactions are
narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties’
personal privacy interests. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y.
2017).
Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon
v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, the proposed redactions are
narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties’
personal privacy interests. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y.
2017).
The Government is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and
corresponding exhibits by no later than December 18, 2020.
corresponding exhibits by no later than December 18, 2020.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 18, 2020
New York, New York
New York, New York
[Signature]
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
2
DOJ-OGR-00002161
DOJ-OGR-00002161
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document