DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg

552 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 552 KB
Summary

A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a procedural argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge. The discussion centers on how to present documents designated for 'refreshing recollection' without exposing identifying information to the public via courtroom screens. The Judge suggests using paper to ensure anonymity, while Mr. Pagliuca argues this is impractical due to the 'thousands of pages' involved.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney
Arguing regarding the logistics of presenting documents for refreshing recollection in court.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, issuing orders regarding anonymity and document presentation.
Jurors Jury
Mentioned regarding the visibility of their screens to the public.
Members of the public Public observers
Concern raised about them seeing identifying information on courtroom screens.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court Hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Southern District of New York Courtroom

Locations (2)

Location Context
Implied by the court reporter firm and case context.
Physical location where the discussion is taking place.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Pagliuca Attorney/Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript where Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'your Honor'.

Key Quotes (4)

"THE COURT: Whatever they are, we're protecting anonymity, which is my order."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. PAGLIUCA: It's an unwieldy and impossible project here, your Honor."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: The way trials have been done for a very long time?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
Quote #3
"MR. PAGLIUCA: It is likely there will be -- there are thousands of pages of potential material that will be at issue."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,348 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 43 12
LBNAMAXTps
1 that those should be treated similarly. To the extent there's
2 an exhibit that can otherwise be shown electronically, like
3 other exhibits that can be shown electronically, of course we
4 have no objection to that. But for documents that contain
5 identifying information, given the location of the jurors'
6 screens in this courtroom and how they would be visible to
7 members of the public, we would request that they be treated
8 like other sealed exhibits.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: These are not exhibits, your Honor, so
10 they won't be admitted into evidence.
11 THE COURT: Same issue, right?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
13 THE COURT: Whatever they are, we're protecting
14 anonymity, which is my order. Screens are visible. Should
15 that be an issue with respect to anything you want to show for
16 refreshing recollection, why not show that on -- you'll show
17 that on paper.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: It's an unwieldy and impossible project
19 here, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: To use paper?
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: To use --
22 THE COURT: The way trials have been done for a very
23 long time?
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: It is likely there will be -- there are
25 thousands of pages of potential material that will be at issue.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011633

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document