Event Details
July 22, 2022
Description
Court Hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Participants (6)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| Mr. Everdell | person | 1327 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| MS. MENNINGER | person | 1436 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell sentencing) dated July 22, 2022. The defense argues that money transfers for a helicopter and Larry Visoski holding car assets for Epstein do not prove the defendant's continued involvement in the conspiracy. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the financial evidence was offered to refute the claim that the defendant had 'moved on' from her association with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013272.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves logistics regarding witnesses identified as Jane, Matt, and Brian. The government (Ms. Moe) seeks confirmation that the defense will not recall Jane so she can be released, noting that Matt has testified and Brian will not be testifying.
DOJ-OGR-00011633.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a procedural argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge. The discussion centers on how to present documents designated for 'refreshing recollection' without exposing identifying information to the public via courtroom screens. The Judge suggests using paper to ensure anonymity, while Mr. Pagliuca argues this is impractical due to the 'thousands of pages' involved.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Visoski by Mr. Everdell regarding flights and the identity of a passenger named Jane.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript.
Date unknown • Not specified
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event