HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837.jpg

1.2 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size: 1.2 MB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness, initially instructing them to look at the camera for the benefit of a future jury, a point clarified by the witness's counsel, Mr. Scarola. The questioning then pivots to the 'scope of investigation,' specifically asking if serious misconduct allegations require more investigation than lesser allegations, to which the witness agrees.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Simpson Examiner / Attorney
Conducting the questioning of the witness; instructs witness on looking at the camera.
Mr. Scarola Attorney (Counsel)
Interjects to clarify why the witness should look at the camera (so the jury can see their face). Referred to as 'you...
The Witness Deponent
Answering questions regarding an investigation; agrees to look at the camera.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Inferred from Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837'

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Deposition of an unnamed witness regarding an investigation.
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Mr. Scarola Attorney-Client The Witness
Mr. Simpson refers to advice given by Scarola as 'good advice from your counsel'.
Mr. Simpson Examiner-Deponent The Witness
Mr. Simpson is asking the questions (marked by Q.) and giving instructions.

Key Quotes (2)

"Would you agree that an allegation of serious misconduct by another person generally requires more investigation than a lesser serious type of allegation?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837.jpg
Quote #1
"it might be helpful if you can, to the extent that you're able, to look into the camera so that the jury for whom this may be played -- at a later time gets to see your full face."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,058 characters)

14
1 a little bit unnatural for you to be responding
2 to questions that are being asked immediately to
3 your right and not be looking directly at the
4 examiner the entire time, but because this is
5 being videotaped, it might be helpful if you can,
6 to the extent that you're able, to look into the
7 camera so that the jury for whom this may be
8 played --
9 THE WITNESS: I see.
10 MR. SCAROLA: -- at a later time gets to see
11 your full face.
12 THE WITNESS: All right. I hope you won't
13 consider me rude then --
14 MR. SIMPSON: I will not consider -- it's
15 good advice from your counsel and I will not
16 consider you rude.
17 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
18 BY MR. SIMPSON:
19 Q. I want to ask you some more questions about
20 the scope of investigation. Would you agree that an
21 allegation of serious misconduct by another person
22 generally requires more investigation than a lesser
23 serious type of allegation?
24 A. Sure. That's a fair statement.
25 Q. And so, for example, before accusing a person
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document