This document is page 14 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness, initially instructing them to look at the camera for the benefit of a future jury, a point clarified by the witness's counsel, Mr. Scarola. The questioning then pivots to the 'scope of investigation,' specifically asking if serious misconduct allegations require more investigation than lesser allegations, to which the witness agrees.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Simpson | Examiner / Attorney |
Conducting the questioning of the witness; instructs witness on looking at the camera.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney (Counsel) |
Interjects to clarify why the witness should look at the camera (so the jury can see their face). Referred to as 'you...
|
| The Witness | Deponent |
Answering questions regarding an investigation; agrees to look at the camera.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837'
|
"Would you agree that an allegation of serious misconduct by another person generally requires more investigation than a lesser serious type of allegation?"Source
"it might be helpful if you can, to the extent that you're able, to look into the camera so that the jury for whom this may be played -- at a later time gets to see your full face."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,058 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document