DOJ-OGR-00001302.jpg

760 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court order / motion (page 12 of 16)
File Size: 760 KB
Summary

This document appears to be page 12 of a legal filing from August 6, 2021, concerning a defendant named Mr. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949). The text outlines significant challenges to the defense, including the recent withdrawal of initial attorneys, the complexity of the case (involving 24 government witnesses and potential 34-40 year sentence), and severe difficulties in trial preparation caused by COVID-19 restrictions at the Santa Fe County Detention Center. Specifically, the defense cites the inability to review documents effectively via Zoom or through glass partitions.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Robertson Defendant
Facing 34-40 years in prison; experiencing difficulties meeting with counsel due to COVID-19 restrictions.
Defense Attorneys (Current) Legal Counsel
Appointed within the last six months; one appointed in the last three weeks.
Defense Attorneys (Initial) Former Legal Counsel
Recently withdrawn from the case.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Santa Fe County Detention Center
Where Mr. Robertson is in custody; limiting meeting capabilities.
The Government
Named 24 witnesses on recent witness list.
Zoom
Used for legal meetings, though with functional limitations.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by Bates stamp).

Timeline (3 events)

2021-08-06
Filing of Document 208
Court Record
Ongoing (2021)
COVID-19 Lockdown conditions affecting legal preparation
Santa Fe County Detention Center
Recent (prior to Aug 6, 2021)
Withdrawal of initial defense attorneys and appointment of new counsel
N/A
Mr. Robertson Defense Attorneys

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of defendant's custody.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Robertson Attorney-Client Defense Counsel
Discussion of meeting requirements and trial preparation.

Key Quotes (3)

"Mr. Robertson’s effective guidelines range would be a staggering 412 to 485 months of imprisonment, or approximately 34 to 40 years."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001302.jpg
Quote #1
"it will be impossible for them to effectively prepare the case for trial with Mr. Robertson in custody under the current lockdown conditions due to COVID-19."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001302.jpg
Quote #2
"the Detention Center has not allowed them to show Mr. Robertson documents by sharing their screen, requiring counsel to instead hold the documents up to their computer’s camera"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001302.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,227 characters)

Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV Document 208 Filed 08/06/21 Page 12 of 16
Complicating matters further is the fact that both of Mr. Robertson’s initial defense attorneys have recently withdrawn from the case, and both of his current attorneys have been appointed within the past six months (one in the last three weeks). The defense team therefore has a considerable amount of catching up to do in a very short amount of time, and defense counsel need to immediately begin meeting with Mr. Robertson on a regular basis. The case is also complex and exceedingly serious. The government has named 24 witnesses on its most recent witness list [Doc. 104] and the Court has issued upwards of 30 written orders over the past three years of contentious pretrial litigation in this case. And if Mr. Robertson is convicted on all charges, he will be facing decades in prison: according to his Form 13 PSR, Mr. Robertson’s effective guidelines range would be a staggering 412 to 485 months of imprisonment, or approximately 34 to 40 years. See Doc. 188 at 15.
Finally, defense counsel explained at the recent pretrial conference that it will be impossible for them to effectively prepare the case for trial with Mr. Robertson in custody under the current lockdown conditions due to COVID-19. In normal times, defense counsel can meet with their clients face to face in meeting rooms at the jails, where they can review discovery and do other critical trial preparation. Now, however, if the jails are allowing in-person client meetings at all, it is with the defendants separated from their counsel by a screen, making it nearly impossible to effectively review documentary evidence. And while defense counsel represented that the Santa Fe County Detention Center is allowing video meetings by Zoom, it is hard to schedule Zoom time due to the limited number of computer facilities at the jail and the number of parties vying for them (including this Court). Defense counsel also represented that while the Zoom meetings have been helpful, the Detention Center has not allowed them to show Mr. Robertson documents by sharing their screen, requiring counsel to instead hold the documents up to their computer’s camera in the
12
DOJ-OGR-00001302

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document