Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MR. ROBERT

Person
Mentions
37
Relationships
21
Events
29
Documents
17
Also known as:
Mr. Robertson
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
21 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Jeff Bezos / his attorneys
Professional
6
1
View
person Mr. Robertson's girlfriend
Friend
6
1
View
person Pretrial Services officer
Supervisory
6
1
View
person attorneys
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization The government
Legal representative
5
1
View
person D.S. Broomhead
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Daniel Novack
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization FBI
Litigation foia requester
5
1
View
person Mr. Robertson's attorneys
Client
5
1
View
person New Attorneys
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Magistrate Judge Briones
Legal representative
5
1
View
person attorneys
Client
5
1
View
person Defense counsel
Client
5
1
View
person Daniel Novack
Client
5
1
View
organization FBI
Litigant adversary
5
1
View
person D.S. Broomhead
Adversarial alleged assailant victim
5
1
View
person N.F.
Business associate
5
1
View
person Robertson's Father
Family
5
1
View
person Martha Vazquez
Judge defendant
1
1
View
person family
Familial
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A COVID-19 Lockdown conditions affecting legal preparation Santa Fe County Detention C... View
N/A Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to investigate Juror No. 1, Ms. Con... Courtroom View
N/A Meeting The defense team needs to meet with Mr. Robertson in person to prepare for trial, review evidence... jail View
N/A Release from custody Mr. Robertson's placement at La Pasada Halfway House on home incarceration under strict conditions. La Pasada Halfway House View
N/A Legal proceeding Mr. Robertson's probation was revoked on several instances for failure to comply with conditions ... N/A View
N/A Surrender Mr. Robertson turned himself in after being charged in the instant case. N/A View
N/A N/A Defendant voluntarily turned himself in Unknown View
N/A Legal proceeding Mr. Robertson asks the Court to reconsider its earlier decision denying him pretrial release, cit... N/A View
2025-09-01 Court ruling The Court denied Mr. Robertson's release. N/A View
2022-06-22 N/A Trial Court View
2021-10-15 N/A Court Order Issued Southern District of New York View
2021-08-06 N/A Withdrawal of initial defense attorneys and appointment of new counsel N/A View
2021-04-05 N/A Current scheduled trial date. Court View
2021-04-05 N/A Scheduled trial date for Mr. Robertson. District of New Mexico View
2021-04-05 Legal proceeding The new date set for the trial in Mr. Robertson's case. N/A View
2021-02-05 N/A Order Setting Conditions of Release filed Court Docket View
2021-02-04 Meeting A pretrial conference where the Court cautioned Mr. Robertson about violating his conditions of r... N/A View
2020-12-21 N/A Mr. Robertson filed his motion for reconsideration. Court View
2020-12-07 N/A Original trial date (delayed). Court View
2020-09-11 Meeting A Status Conference was held regarding Mr. Robertson's case. N/A View
2020-03-23 Legal proceeding The original date set for Mr. Robertson's trial, which was later suspended. N/A View
2020-02-06 N/A Filing of Document 306 in Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV District Court (10th Circui... View
2020-01-01 N/A Mr. Robertson asked Court to consider release (Doc. 181). District of New Mexico View
2020-01-01 N/A Mr. Robertson denied release. Court View
2017-12-11 Legal proceeding Magistrate Judge B. Paul Briones ordered Mr. Robertson to be detained. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00001306.jpg

This is the final page (16) of a court order issued by US District Judge Martha Vazquez on February 6, 2021. The order grants Mr. Robertson's motion for immediate release (Doc 274) to allow him to prepare for an upcoming trial with his defense team, citing the need for preparation time and potential quarantine at 'La Pasada.' The judge simultaneously denies the government's emergency motion to stay the release order.

Court order / legal ruling
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001304.jpg

This document is page 14 of a court order filed on Feb 6, 2021, in Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV (United States v. Robertson). The Court is rejecting the government's proposed alternatives to release, specifically arguing that interview rooms with 'screens' at the Santa Fe courthouse or jail are inadequate for effective trial preparation because attorneys cannot sit next to the defendant, Mr. Robertson, to review documents. The Court also scolds the government for presenting these alternatives too late, noting they should have been raised before the unfavorable ruling.

Court order / legal opinion
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001303.jpg

This legal document is a filing by Mr. Robertson's defense team arguing against the government's motion for reconsideration of his pretrial release. The defense contends that continued detention, especially with COVID-19 restrictions in jails, prevents the necessary in-person meetings required to build trust and adequately prepare for trial, thereby infringing on his right to a fair trial. They assert that his release is essential for the preparation of his defense.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001302.jpg

This document appears to be page 12 of a legal filing from August 6, 2021, concerning a defendant named Mr. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949). The text outlines significant challenges to the defense, including the recent withdrawal of initial attorneys, the complexity of the case (involving 24 government witnesses and potential 34-40 year sentence), and severe difficulties in trial preparation caused by COVID-19 restrictions at the Santa Fe County Detention Center. Specifically, the defense cites the inability to review documents effectively via Zoom or through glass partitions.

Legal filing / court order / motion (page 12 of 16)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001301.jpg

This document is page 11 of a court filing (Case 4:17-cr-02949-MV) dated February 3, 2021. It argues for the pretrial release of a defendant named Mr. Robertson under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) to allow him to prepare for his trial scheduled for April 5, 2021. The text cites various legal precedents regarding temporary release for defense preparation. Note: While the user requested an 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page pertains to a 'Mr. Robertson' and does not contain direct text references to Jeffrey Epstein.

Court filing / legal order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001300.jpg

This legal document outlines the Court's decision to grant Mr. Robertson release to a halfway house under extremely strict conditions, including home incarceration and GPS monitoring. The Court details numerous restrictions on his movement, communication, and contact with others, believing these measures are sufficient to ensure community safety and prevent flight risk. The document also notes a pretrial conference where Mr. Robertson was warned that any violation would result in immediate reincarceration.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001299.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes the case for the pre-trial release of a defendant, Mr. Robertson. The Court weighs his history of probation violations and non-violent convictions against the lack of evidence for violent behavior and the government's unsubstantiated claims of witness intimidation. The document emphasizes the legal principle of presumption of innocence in considering Mr. Robertson's danger to the community.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001298.jpg

This document is page 8 of a court order regarding the pretrial release of a defendant named Mr. Robertson. The court discusses the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), noting the serious nature of the charges, which involve Robertson allegedly shooting a victim (D.S.) in retaliation for cooperating with the government. While the evidence is described as 'mixed' due to conflicting factors regarding identification, the court notes incriminating statements made to a witness (N.F.). The document appears to be part of a DOJ FOIA release (DOJ-OGR-00001298).

Court order / legal opinion (pretrial release determination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001297.jpg

This document is page 7 of a court order filed on February 6, 2020, regarding 'Mr. Robertson' (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court discusses the legal standards for detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 and finds that Mr. Robertson has successfully rebutted the presumption of detention. Factors cited for his release include his voluntary surrender, family ties, and placement at La Pasada Halfway House.

Court order / legal opinion (page 7 of 16)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001296.jpg

This document is page 6 of a court order filed on February 8, 2021, regarding United States v. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court is reconsidering and granting Mr. Robertson's release to the La Pasada Halfway House due to trial delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the inability to hold in-person attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse. The court cites 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and strict conditions as the basis for assuring community safety and the defendant's appearance.

Legal court order / opinion
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001294.jpg

This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Mr. Robertson, asking the court to reconsider its denial of his pretrial release. The motion argues for reconsideration based on new evidence, specifically unforeseen trial continuances and new potential placement options, including with the grandmother of his children and at La Pasada Halfway House. The document cites legal precedent to establish that the court has the authority to amend its prior orders.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001293.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV) from the District of New Mexico, dated February 5, 2021. It discusses the prolonged pretrial custody of a Mr. Robertson due to COVID-19 related court suspensions and details the turnover of his legal defense team. The text also references a motion for release based on Robertson's compromised immune system and the proposal of his father as a custodian.

Legal filing / court order (page 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001292.jpg

This legal document, a Memorandum Opinion and Order, outlines the background of a criminal case against Mr. Robertson. He is charged with multiple felonies, including obstruction of justice for allegedly shooting an informant, D.S., in September 2017. The document notes that Robertson has been in pretrial detention for over three years and that his trial, originally set for March 2020, was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and is now scheduled for April 5, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001291.jpg

This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico regarding Defendant Dashawn Robertson's motion for reconsideration of his detention order. After reviewing various filings and holding a pretrial conference on February 4, 2021, the Court ordered Mr. Robertson's release under strict conditions to La Pasada Halfway House on February 5, 2021. The decision was made to ensure his appearance in court and community safety, and to facilitate his trial preparation, which was hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic affecting communication with his attorneys.

Legal document (memorandum opinion and order)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on February 24, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, who is questioned about their firm's decision not to investigate potential juror misconduct by Juror No. 1, Ms. Conrad, following a verdict on May 24th. Brune states that the firm did not believe there was an issue to investigate at the time.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029418.jpg

This document is the final page (page 3) of a legal complaint filed on May 25, 2017, against the FBI for violating the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The plaintiff, represented by attorney Daniel Novack, alleges the FBI failed to respond to a request by Mr. Robertson regarding an individual (implied to be Epstein) who received preferential treatment due to wealth and connections. The plaintiff seeks a court order compelling the FBI to produce the requested documents and pay attorney fees.

Legal complaint / court filing (civil action)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029407.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a civil complaint filed on May 25, 2017, against the FBI. The plaintiff, Mr. Robertson (represented by attorney Daniel Novack), alleges the FBI violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by failing to respond to a request for records, presumably regarding Jeffrey Epstein (referenced implicitly regarding 'preferential treatment'). The plaintiff seeks a court order to compel the release of documents and expedited proceedings.

Legal filing (civil complaint - page 3)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
2
Total
6

Legal Consultation via Zoom

From: Defense counsel
To: MR. ROBERT

Limited scheduling availability; inability to share screens to review documents.

Video call
N/A
Communication Source

Incriminating statements

From: MR. ROBERT
To: N.F. (Witness)

N.F. testified that Robertson made incriminating statements.

Oral statement
N/A
Communication Source

Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 274)

From: MR. ROBERT
To: THE COURT

Legal filing requesting reconsideration of a previous ruling.

Motion
2020-12-21
Communication Source

Attorney-client meetings

From: attorneys
To: MR. ROBERT

Unrestricted attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse were rejected due to COVID-19 concerns.

Meeting
2020-01-01
Communication Source

Request for documents

From: MR. ROBERT
To: FBI

Request for records which the FBI failed to respond to or assign a tracking number.

Foia request
2017-05-25
Communication Source

Request for documents

From: MR. ROBERT
To: FBI

Request for records which received no response or tracking number.

Foia request
2017-05-25
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search