This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Government) |
Addressing the court regarding scheduling and witness testimony scope.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Responding to scheduling questions; previously asked the government to limit witness testimony.
|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
Currently on cross-examination; identified as a psychologist testifying as a lay witness.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the session.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.
|
"the witness was asked some questions about hindsight bias, which I expect to be a subject of expert testimony"Source
"she is testifying as a lay witness and that she shouldn't be asked questions on cross examination that would be the subject of expert testimony."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,524 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document