This page contains a transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A defense attorney is arguing before the judge to limit the testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The argument focuses on distinguishing between factual testimony regarding metadata (which the defense accepts) and expert opinion, as well as precluding testimony regarding CDs (Compact Discs) because Flatley was only disclosed to review 'devices.'
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Flatley | Witness / Analyst |
Subject of the discussion regarding the scope of his testimony on metadata and devices.
|
| Unidentified Speaker | Attorney (likely Defense) |
Addressing the court, arguing to limit the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The recipient of the speaker's argument.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The government |
Referenced regarding their intent to put on evidence.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied court jurisdiction (Southern District of New York based on case number suffix PAE).
|
"If a document has metadata, any old person can right-click on it, look at the properties, and read what those properties are."Source
"There's only one portion of the November 26 disclosure that I believe treads into opinion expert land"Source
"Mr. Flatley will testify that he verified the accuracy of metadata by running a particular program."Source
"He also was not ever disclosed as a fact or expert witness with regard to CDs."Source
"The original notice and the supplemental notice all refer to his review of devices."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,645 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document