DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg

630 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 630 KB
Summary

This page contains a transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A defense attorney is arguing before the judge to limit the testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The argument focuses on distinguishing between factual testimony regarding metadata (which the defense accepts) and expert opinion, as well as precluding testimony regarding CDs (Compact Discs) because Flatley was only disclosed to review 'devices.'

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Flatley Witness / Analyst
Subject of the discussion regarding the scope of his testimony on metadata and devices.
Unidentified Speaker Attorney (likely Defense)
Addressing the court, arguing to limit the scope of Mr. Flatley's testimony.
Your Honor Judge
The recipient of the speaker's argument.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The government
Referenced regarding their intent to put on evidence.
DOJ
Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

August 10, 2022
Document Filed
Court Record
Unknown (Trial/Hearing)
Legal argument regarding scope of witness testimony
Courtroom
Defense Attorney Judge Mr. Flatley (discussed)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied court jurisdiction (Southern District of New York based on case number suffix PAE).

Relationships (1)

Mr. Flatley Witness for Prosecution The government
Speaker references the government's intent to put on evidence through him.

Key Quotes (5)

"If a document has metadata, any old person can right-click on it, look at the properties, and read what those properties are."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
Quote #1
"There's only one portion of the November 26 disclosure that I believe treads into opinion expert land"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Flatley will testify that he verified the accuracy of metadata by running a particular program."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
Quote #3
"He also was not ever disclosed as a fact or expert witness with regard to CDs."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
Quote #4
"The original notice and the supplemental notice all refer to his review of devices."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,645 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 264 1435
LC7VMAX1
1 Your Honor, with respect to any testimony that was in
2 the November 26 disclosure, which I believe is not what was
3 disclosed earlier in September, but most of it is what I would
4 agree is factual testimony. If a document has metadata, any
5 old person can right-click on it, look at the properties, and
6 read what those properties are.
7 There's only one portion of the November 26 disclosure
8 that I believe treads into opinion expert land, and that is on
9 the second page of the November 26 disclosure where Mr. Flatley
10 will testify that he verified the accuracy of metadata by
11 running a particular program. He will explain what metadata
12 is, such as the file name and when the file was created, and
13 where it can be stored in a computer system.
14 Your Honor, if those are the only things that
15 Mr. Flatley intends to testify about, then I think we're fine.
16 It's the things that came in the disclosures on November --
17 there were more on November 26 that were not in this letter and
18 there were things on December 3rd that were disclosed. If he
19 is limited to those things that were put in the September 26
20 disclosure, I'm fine with that, your Honor.
21 He also was not ever disclosed as a fact or expert
22 witness with regard to CDs. The original notice and the
23 supplemental notice all refer to his review of devices. So I
24 believe that the government does not intend to put on evidence
25 about CDs through him, but those are the two areas that I think
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013026

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document