This is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 45) of a defense motion arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on restrictive bail. The defense argues that the government lacks corroborating documentary evidence, relying instead on old witness testimony, and asserts that Maxwell is suffering under oppressive confinement conditions at the MDC, including isolation and COVID-19 risks. The document also references extradition laws in the UK and France and complaints about discovery failures.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail motion, currently detained in MDC, claims innocence.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Co-conspirator |
Mentioned in relation to media spikes a year prior.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Opposing party, accused of providing lack of corroborating evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center, where Maxwell is detained.
|
|
| United Kingdom Government |
Mentioned regarding extradition laws.
|
|
| French Government |
Mentioned regarding extradition laws.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by footer DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Potential location for extradition discussion.
|
|
|
Potential location for extradition discussion.
|
|
|
Detention facility (likely Brooklyn, NY).
|
"The evidence in this case boils down to witness testimony about events that took place over 25 years ago."Source
"Ms. Maxwell has now been detained for over 150 days in the equivalent of solitary confinement since she was indicted and arrested on July 2, 2020"Source
"The discovery contains no meaningful documentary corroboration as to Maxwell and only a small number of documents from the time period of the conspiracy charged in the indictment."Source
"Ms. Maxwell Should Be Placed on Restrictive Bail Conditions"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,026 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document