United Kingdom
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
U.S. Department of Justice
|
International cooperation |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00031733.pdf
This document is a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom, concerning the extradition of six terrorism suspects (including Abu Hamza) to the United States. The applicants argued that extradition would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the risk of solitary confinement at ADX Florence and the possibility of grossly disproportionate life sentences. The Court unanimously ruled that extradition would not violate Article 3, finding that conditions at ADX Florence and the potential sentences did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
EFTA00027293.pdf
This document is a formal request from the U.S. Department of Justice (via the U.S. Embassy in London) to the UK Home Office dated August 4, 2021. It requests expedited assistance in obtaining evidence—specifically school records, a birth certificate, and travel records—regarding a victim/witness for the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes the urgency due to the trial scheduled for November 2021 and references the charges related to the sexual exploitation of minors by Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004.
EFTA00010321.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, the legal team representing the Duke of York (Prince Andrew). The correspondence details a stalemate in negotiations regarding the Duke's cooperation with the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The Duke's lawyers offer a written witness statement limited primarily to the 1994-1997 period, citing concerns that the US views him as a 'subject' rather than a witness. The SDNY rejects this offer, declaring the written statement insufficient, and informs the defense they will proceed with a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request to the UK authorities (UKCA) to seek a compelled interview.
DOJ-OGR-00001208.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal opinion written by David Perry QC of 6KBW College Hill, dated December 17, 2020. It analyzes UK extradition law, specifically concluding that no bars to extradition (such as asylum or national security) apply to Ms. Maxwell. It also discusses the rarity of the Secretary of State refusing extradition (citing the Gary McKinnon case) and notes that contested extradition cases typically conclude within two years.
DOJ-OGR-00001159.jpg
This is page 14 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00001159) of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues against bail, citing the defendant's flight risk, wealth, and ability to frustrate extradition from France or the UK. A critical footnote reveals that in 2018, the defendant and her spouse established a trust account where they both falsely listed their marital status as 'single' on bank forms.
DOJ-OGR-00002224(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 23, 2020, by French lawyer William Julié regarding the extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Julié argues that the US-France Extradition Treaty allows France discretion to extradite its own citizens, countering the DOJ's reliance on the 2007 'Peterson case' precedent. The text analyzes the Peterson case, noting it was a discretionary decision by the Ministry of Justice rather than a court ruling, and references a 2007 letter from Senators Obama and Durbin regarding that matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002109.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the legal viability of Ghislaine Maxwell resisting extradition from the UK to the US. It specifically argues that she would fail to invoke Article 6 (fair trial) or Article 8 (private and family life) of the ECHR to stop extradition. The conclusion begins to state that if she absconded to the UK in breach of US bail, she would likely be denied bail there.
DOJ-OGR-00002105.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
DOJ-OGR-00002084.jpg
This document is a statement from a security consultant detailing their extensive military and security background. The consultant attests to providing security services for Ghislaine Maxwell from July 2019 until her arrest on July 2, 2020. The statement highlights the security threats Maxwell faced, including death threats related to her past relationship with Jeffery Epstein and aggressive harassment from the press.
DOJ-OGR-00001983.jpg
This is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 45) of a defense motion arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on restrictive bail. The defense argues that the government lacks corroborating documentary evidence, relying instead on old witness testimony, and asserts that Maxwell is suffering under oppressive confinement conditions at the MDC, including isolation and COVID-19 risks. The document also references extradition laws in the UK and France and complaints about discovery failures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020645.jpg
This document is page 186 (Appendix 2) from a House Oversight Committee report (Bates numbered 020645). It contains a bibliography/endnotes section (notes 20-29) focused heavily on UK-China relations, specifically covering concerns over ZTE, nuclear power investment, human rights, and academic influence at institutions like Cambridge and the London School of Economics (LSE). While part of a larger release that may involve Epstein, this specific page focuses on foreign influence in the UK, including the Woolf Inquiry into LSE's ties to Libya.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029049.jpg
This document appears to be a transcript page from the House Oversight Committee records (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029049). The text features a speaker (speaking on behalf of Breitbart) analyzing the political landscape, drawing parallels between the US Tea Party's conflict with the Republican establishment and UKIP's conflict with the UK Conservative Party. The speaker decries 'crony capitalism' in Washington DC and positions Breitbart as the voice for social conservatives and the anti-establishment right. Note: While the prompt requests Epstein-related data, this specific page contains no visible references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029028.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a transcript (likely an interview or speech) bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. The text features an unidentified speaker (likely associated with Breitbart, given the use of 'we') discussing the political strategy of the Tea Party and Breitbart News. The speaker compares the Tea Party's conflict with the Republican establishment to UKIP's conflict with the Conservative Party in the UK. The text focuses on 'crony capitalism,' national debt, and social conservatism. NOTE: While the prompt describes this as 'Epstein-related,' there is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his operations in the visible text of this specific page.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity