This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated July 6, 2020. It argues for a 'partial closure' of the courtroom proceedings due to the health risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, citing specific infection statistics for New Hampshire and the United States. The document references the legal precedent *United States v. Smith* to justify security measures and closures in the interest of public safety.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | Defendant in cited case |
Cited in legal precedent United States v. Smith regarding partial courtroom closure.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. |
Cited as source for COVID-19 statistics.
|
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio |
Cited as source for COVID-19 data tracking.
|
|
| Real Clear Politics |
Cited as source for national COVID-19 statistics.
|
|
| U.S. Marshal |
Mentioned in the case citation regarding security policies after September 11th.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals (2d Cir.) |
Court that issued the opinion in United States v. Smith (2005).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where COVID-19 statistics are being cited.
|
"COVID-19 presents an enormous danger to the health and safety of the public, including the litigants, security, and court personnel involved in this proceeding."Source
"The court’s interest in preventing the spread of COVID-19... is a weighty and substantial interest that would likely be prejudiced if the court were not to impose this partial closure."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,631 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document