DOJ-OGR-00016454.jpg
568 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal filing
File Size:
568 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring defense attorney Mr. Everdell moving for a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a). Everdell argues that the government's evidence is insufficient to convict Ms. Maxwell, specifically addressing Counts One and Two (enticement and conspiracy) which rely on the testimony of a witness named 'Jane.' He asserts the government failed to prove Maxwell enticed Jane to travel to New York for illegal sex acts.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing a motion for judgment of acquittal on behalf of the defense.
|
| The Court (Judge) | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings and interacting with Mr. Everdell.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the trial; the defense argues there is insufficient evidence to convict her.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
A witness whose testimony is critical to Counts One and Two (enticement counts).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced as the party that elicited evidence in its case-in-chief.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (Rule 29(a))
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied)
Mr. Everdell
The Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location Jane was allegedly enticed to travel to; jurisdiction for relevant laws.
|
Relationships (2)
Text discusses whether Maxwell 'persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to engage in sex acts'.
Everdell speaks on behalf of 'the defense' regarding the conviction of Ms. Maxwell.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, the defense moves at this time for a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on the grounds that the evidence elicited by the government in its case-in-chief is insufficient to establish each element of the offenses charged in the S2 indictment beyond a reasonable doubt."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016454.jpg
Quote #1
"To convict Ms. Maxwell, the government must show that Ms. Maxwell persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to engage in sex acts that would violate New York law"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016454.jpg
Quote #2
"There is no evidence in the record that Ms. Maxwell or anyone else who"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016454.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,553 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 267 2266
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 THE COURT: Go ahead, Mr. Everdell.
2 Do you want to come to the podium?
3 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, please.
4 Your Honor, the defense moves at this time for a
5 judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on the grounds that the
6 evidence elicited by the government in its case-in-chief is
7 insufficient to establish each element of the offenses charged
8 in the S2 indictment beyond a reasonable doubt.
9 THE COURT: Move as to all counts?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Move as to all counts, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Go ahead.
12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do make this application
13 with respect to every count in the S2 indictment; but for
14 purposes of today, I'm going to confine my comments to address
15 specifically Counts One and Two.
16 THE COURT: Okay.
17 MR. EVERDELL: Which are the enticement counts,
18 conspiracy, and the substantive enticement counts.
19 Your Honor, as the Court is aware, those counts depend
20 on the testimony of Jane.
21 To convict Ms. Maxwell, the government must show that
22 Ms. Maxwell persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to
23 engage in sex acts that would violate New York law and the
24 specific law that's cited in the indictment. There is no
25 evidence in the record that Ms. Maxwell or anyone else who
2 Do you want to come to the podium?
3 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, please.
4 Your Honor, the defense moves at this time for a
5 judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on the grounds that the
6 evidence elicited by the government in its case-in-chief is
7 insufficient to establish each element of the offenses charged
8 in the S2 indictment beyond a reasonable doubt.
9 THE COURT: Move as to all counts?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Move as to all counts, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Go ahead.
12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do make this application
13 with respect to every count in the S2 indictment; but for
14 purposes of today, I'm going to confine my comments to address
15 specifically Counts One and Two.
16 THE COURT: Okay.
17 MR. EVERDELL: Which are the enticement counts,
18 conspiracy, and the substantive enticement counts.
19 Your Honor, as the Court is aware, those counts depend
20 on the testimony of Jane.
21 To convict Ms. Maxwell, the government must show that
22 Ms. Maxwell persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to
23 engage in sex acts that would violate New York law and the
24 specific law that's cited in the indictment. There is no
25 evidence in the record that Ms. Maxwell or anyone else who
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016454
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document