The Court (Judge)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jury/Foreperson
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding / witness testimony | Direct examination of Elizabeth Loftus, a professor and scientist, who was called as a witness by... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim Teala Davies provides a statement about the impact of Jeffrey Eps... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | An attorney addresses the court regarding an article by Professor Green, the rights of victims un... | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00017109.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione. The proceedings focus on a motion by media organizations (NY Post, Daily News, NY Times) to unseal letters regarding Tartaglione's housing conditions at the MCC and MDC. The Judge rules against the Bureau of Prisons and orders the letters unsealed, citing the public interest in BOP conditions and the fact that Tartaglione's background (and connection to the Epstein incident) is already public knowledge. The hearing also touches on trial scheduling and the government's decision not to seek a warrant for a specific telephone.
DOJ-OGR-00014832.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330). In this statement, Maxwell addresses the court, acknowledging the suffering of the victims and admitting her conviction for helping Jeffrey Epstein. She attempts to distance herself by characterizing Epstein as a manipulative man who fooled everyone, while stating that meeting him was the greatest regret of her life.
DOJ-OGR-00008626.jpg
This document is page 88 of a court filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 1: Role of the Court,' which explains the judge's responsibility to define the law and the jury's sworn duty to follow those legal instructions regardless of personal opinion or opposing statements by attorneys. The text emphasizes that the jury must consider the instructions as a whole during deliberation.
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning United States v. Maxwell. The judge is ruling against Ms. Maxwell's motion for release, stating that unlike other cases, she has not argued specific health vulnerabilities to COVID-19. The court also rejects the argument that prison restrictions at the MDC prevent her from preparing her defense, noting the case is in early stages.
DOJ-OGR-00000658.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg describes the conditions at the MCC and SHU as 'medieval' and 'horrific,' citing vermin and lack of sunlight. He also explicitly states that the defense disputes the conclusions of the medical examiner regarding their client's death.
DOJ-OGR-00016265.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies about her reluctance to go to New Mexico to see Jeffrey Epstein due to a prior incident in a New York movie theater, stating she only felt comfortable going because her mother told her Maxwell (whom she viewed as Epstein's romantic partner) would be present. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises a hearsay objection regarding the mother's statement, which the judge overrules with a limiting instruction.
DOJ-OGR-00001946.jpg
This is page 69 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 10, 2020. Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney is arguing before the judge regarding her continued detention, stating that the government's cited case law regarding COVID-19 risks involves dangerous felons and is not relevant to Maxwell's situation. The attorney emphasizes the impossibility of preparing for trial with only four months of discovery while unable to meet the client in person due to BOP restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00021989.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated December 19, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). Ms. Donaleski, representing the government, states no objection to expanding the defendant's travel to the Middle District of Pennsylvania but strongly opposes the defendant possessing a firearm due to safety concerns for Pretrial Services officers who conduct unscheduled home visits. The Court agrees with the government and Judge Netburn's previous ruling, denying the application to keep the firearm as a 'commonsense safety measure.'
DOJ-OGR-00021644.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. During the proceeding, Maxwell's attorney, Ms. Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be designated to the BOP women's facility in Danbury and enrolled in the FIT (Female Integrated Treatment) program to address trauma. The Court agrees to make this recommendation and subsequently grants the government's motion, presented by Ms. Moe, to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight.
DOJ-OGR-00021626.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is excessive and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim compares Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that Epstein was 'far more culpable' yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00016603.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim examines Professor Elizabeth Loftus, successfully proffering her as an expert witness in memory science despite objections from prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. Loftus begins her testimony by explaining to the jury that human memory does not function like a recording device but is a complex reconstruction process.
DOJ-OGR-00016454.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring defense attorney Mr. Everdell moving for a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a). Everdell argues that the government's evidence is insufficient to convict Ms. Maxwell, specifically addressing Counts One and Two (enticement and conspiracy) which rely on the testimony of a witness named 'Jane.' He asserts the government failed to prove Maxwell enticed Jane to travel to New York for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00010257.jpg
This document is page 42 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a questioning session, likely of a juror (Juror 50), regarding their decision to give press interviews about their status as a sexual abuse victim. The witness explains they did not believe their family or friends would find out because they didn't use their full name and assumed the story wouldn't be major news.
DOJ-OGR-00008712.jpg
This document is page 6 (filed 12/19/21) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains 'Instruction No. 1: Role of the Court,' outlining the jury's obligation to accept the law as provided by the judge regardless of personal opinion or opposing statements by attorneys. The page includes a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00008699.jpg
This document is page 161 of a court filing (Document 563) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 59, which outlines the procedures for the start of deliberations, including the election of a foreperson, the method for communicating with the judge via written notes passed to Marshals, and strict rules regarding the privacy and weight of juror notes.
DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011555.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 22, 2022. The Judge is issuing a ruling regarding objections to the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR), specifically noting the defense's argument to use 2003 sentencing guidelines versus 2004 guidelines. The text explicitly mentions that the government's sole objection to the guideline calculation is that Virginia Roberts and Melissa should be formally considered victims.
Extension of deliberation hours due to COVID-19
The Judge explains the decision to extend deliberation hours by one hour daily due to the omicron variant spike in NYC to avoid trial disruption.
Requests for testimony or other questions during delibera...
The document outlines the formal procedure for the jury to communicate with the court. All requests must be in writing, signed by the foreperson, and given to a Marshal to deliver to the judge.
Prison designation and dismissal of counts for Ms. Maxwell
A discussion in court where Ms. Sternheim requests Ms. Maxwell's placement in the Danbury facility and FIT program, which the court recommends. Ms. Moe, for the government, then moves to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight, which the court grants.
Deliberation Instructions
Instructions regarding separation of alternates, schedule for deliberation, and swearing of the Marshal.
Jury Selection Protocol
Instructions regarding the arrival of 58 jurors, the questions to be asked regarding bias, and the procedure for peremptory strikes.
Character Reference / Sentencing Submission
Kevin Maxwell urges the court to consider Ghislaine's good character, charity work, and family support during sentencing.
Jury Questionnaire Instructions
Instructions on filling out questionnaires, COVID-19 safety protocols (masks/distancing), and conduct rules.
Bail Hearing / Argument regarding NPA
Oral argument regarding why the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not apply to the defendant and why bail should be denied due to flight risk.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity