DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the testimony of a records custodian and the government's failure to list a specific financial institution prior to trial. Additionally, Mr. Pagliuca requests permission to use electronic methods for impeaching or refreshing the recollection of witnesses during the trial.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing; ruling on witness list issues.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Responding to the judge regarding outstanding issues.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Raising a procedural request regarding electronic impeachment material.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Records Custodian |
Subject of discussion regarding their level of seniority and testimony relevance.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned by the Court as having failed to include a financial institution on a list.
|
|
| Unnamed Financial Institution |
An entity that will be mentioned during trial but was omitted from the government's list.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) discussion regarding witness lists and trial procedures.
Southern District of New York (Implied by footer)
Relationships (2)
Context implies she represents the government side in the discussion.
Addressing the judge as 'Your Honor'.
Key Quotes (4)
"It sounds like the government failed to include a financial institution that will be mentioned during trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
Quote #1
"I think if you think it's an issue, it's a peremptory."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
Quote #2
"I wanted to talk a little bit about use of impeachment material during trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
Quote #3
"if we are going to be either impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness, that we be able to do it electronically."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011631.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,413 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 43 10
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 something, and this witness is technically, I believe, a
2 records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your
3 standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of
4 ancillary to the charges in this indictment.
5 THE COURT: All right.
6 The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list
7 of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was
8 to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government
9 failed to include a financial institution that will be
10 mentioned during trial.
11 I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that,
12 having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue,
13 it's a peremptory.
14 What else?
15 MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than
16 the outstanding ones your Honor outlined.
17 THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of
20 impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well,
21 what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either
22 impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness,
23 that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that
24 would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The
25 problem with using impeachment material during the course of
2 records custodian. He may be of a higher level than your
3 standard records custodian, but his testimony is sort of
4 ancillary to the charges in this indictment.
5 THE COURT: All right.
6 The purpose of me asking the parties to submit a list
7 of entities or addresses that may be mentioned during trial was
8 to capture this sort of issue. It sounds like the government
9 failed to include a financial institution that will be
10 mentioned during trial.
11 I agree. It's too late to go back and redo that,
12 having failed to do so. So I think if you think it's an issue,
13 it's a peremptory.
14 What else?
15 MS. COMEY: No other issues, your Honor, other than
16 the outstanding ones your Honor outlined.
17 THE COURT: OK. Any -- go ahead.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 Your Honor, I wanted to talk a little bit about use of
20 impeachment material during trial. I have a concern -- well,
21 what I am proposing is that if we are going to be either
22 impeaching or refreshing recollection of a particular witness,
23 that we be able to do it electronically. I think that that
24 would be fine, and that's typically how we would do this. The
25 problem with using impeachment material during the course of
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011631
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document