DOJ-OGR-00005386.jpg
260 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court correspondence
File Size:
260 KB
Summary
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated October 27, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues that the government is prioritizing witness convenience over the prudence of seating a fair and impartial jury, characterizing the government's actions as seeking an 'undue and unreasonable advantage.'
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Attorney |
Signatory of the document; attorney representing the defense (implied by context of Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Ghislai...
|
| Government Counsel | Prosecution |
Listed as CC recipients; the opposing party in the legal argument.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim |
Letterhead organization.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced in the text as the opposing party seeking advantage.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Relationships (1)
Sternheim is arguing against the government's efforts in the filing.
Key Quotes (2)
"more focused on unfounded inconvenience to its witnesses above prudence in seating a jury that can be fair and impartial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005386.jpg
Quote #1
"It is but another effort by the government to seek an undue and unreasonable advantage and it should not be countenanced."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005386.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (429 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 375 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
more focused on unfounded inconvenience to its witnesses above prudence in seating a jury that
can be fair and impartial. It is but another effort by the government to seek an undue and
unreasonable advantage and it should not be countenanced.
can be fair and impartial. It is but another effort by the government to seek an undue and
unreasonable advantage and it should not be countenanced.
Very truly yours,
/s/
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
cc: Government Counsel
2
DOJ-OGR-00005386
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document