DOJ-OGR-00008995.jpg
515 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
515 KB
Summary
This document is a court order filed on February 24, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number and context). The order mandates 'Juror 50' to appear in person on March 8, 2022, to testify under oath regarding specific issues, likely related to juror misconduct allegations. It also establishes deadlines for the prosecution and defense to submit proposed questions for the juror and to request redactions for a sealed Opinion & Order.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | United States District Judge |
Signatory of the order requiring Juror 50 to appear.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror/Witness |
Ordered to appear in court to give testimony under oath regarding potential misconduct or disclosure issues.
|
| Counsel for the Defendant | Legal Counsel |
Permitted to submit proposed questions for the hearing.
|
| Counsel for the Government | Legal Counsel |
Permitted to submit proposed questions for the hearing.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
The court issuing the order.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Appellate court referenced for legal precedence (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.).
|
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga |
Referenced in a legal citation.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-03-01
Deadline for proposed questions submission
N/A
Counsel for Defendant
Counsel for Government
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location designated for the hearing.
|
|
|
Specific room where Juror 50 must appear.
|
Relationships (1)
Judge Nathan orders Juror 50 to appear for questioning.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Court ORDERS Juror 50 to appear in Courtroom 906 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse... to give testimony under oath in response to the Court’s questions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008995.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court will ensure public access and will provide information on public access as soon as it is available."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008995.jpg
Quote #2
"By noon on February 25, 2022, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either seeks limited redactions to the Opinion & Order"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008995.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,297 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 610 Filed 02/24/22 Page 3 of 3
Court will conduct the questioning at the public hearing with input from counsel for the
Defendant and the Government. The parties may submit by email proposed questions in
accordance with the Opinion & Order on or before March 1, 2022.
Defendant and the Government. The parties may submit by email proposed questions in
accordance with the Opinion & Order on or before March 1, 2022.
The hearing will take place on March 8, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The Court ORDERS Juror
50 to appear in Courtroom 906 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre
Street, New York, New York at that date and time to give testimony under oath in response to
the Court’s questions. The Court will ensure public access and will provide information on
public access as soon as it is available.
50 to appear in Courtroom 906 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre
Street, New York, New York at that date and time to give testimony under oath in response to
the Court’s questions. The Court will ensure public access and will provide information on
public access as soon as it is available.
The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion & Order to the parties. By noon on
February 25, 2022, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either seeks limited
redactions to the Opinion & Order, conforming any requests to this Court’s prior order, Dkt. No.
596, and justifying any such request by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second
Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
February 25, 2022, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either seeks limited
redactions to the Opinion & Order, conforming any requests to this Court’s prior order, Dkt. No.
596, and justifying any such request by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second
Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
SO ORDERED.
[Signature]
Dated: February 24, 2022
New York, New York
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
3
DOJ-OGR-00008995
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document