Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
LocationRelationship Network
047.pdf
This document is a letter dated December 26, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests a one-week extension (until January 2, 2020) for the defendants, including the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and related corporate entities, to file a reply supporting their Motion to Dismiss in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street. The plaintiff consented to this extension request.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
027.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2019, requesting a two-week extension for the Defendants (Executors of Epstein's Estate and related entities) to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter notes that Plaintiff's counsel refused to consent to the extension.
024.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on October 16, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and serves to alert the court to a recent decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke) where Judge Castel allowed a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, supporting Edwards' client's similar motion.
050.pdf
A court order from the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, dated August 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman orders that the hearing scheduled for the following day, August 27, 2019, at 10:30 a.m., will take place in Courtroom 110 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at 40 Foley Square.
020.pdf
A letter filed on February 20, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Moskowitz requests a one-day extension for filing a Motion to Dismiss due to illness, pushing the deadline to February 24, 2020. The document includes a memo endorsement signed by Judge Gardephe on February 22, 2020, granting the request.
019.pdf
Legal correspondence dated February 20, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Paul G. Gardephe regarding the case Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests a one-business-day extension for filing the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to the attorney's recent illness, adjusting the deadline to February 24, 2020.
007.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests approval for an agreement where the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) accept service of a complaint by Anastasia Doe and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond. The document includes a handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement by Judge Nathan dated January 8, 2020.
037.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated December 30, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer sets deadlines for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint (by Jan 13, 2020) and for subsequent responses from the defendants. The order establishes a procedural schedule following the defendants' motion to dismiss filed on December 23, 2019.
034.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on December 23, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The defendants, representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporations, are moving to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The hearing is scheduled before Judge Paul E. Engelmayer.
021.pdf
A legal filing from Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities in the case Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Engelmayer of an agreement between parties regarding the acceptance of service and an extension of time until December 21, 2019, for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The judge granted and signed the order on November 5, 2019.
023.pdf
This document is a Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed on April 14, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 1:19-cv-10479). The executors of Epstein's estate, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, represented by Troutman Sanders LLP, are moving to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).
EFTA00037879.pdf
This document is a forwarded email chain containing a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Epstein. The notice details an Order by Judge Richard M. Berman scheduling a Status Conference for August 27, 2019, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse. The email correspondence includes a request for additional agents/TFOs to assist with coordination due to an expected large number of victims attending the court proceeding.
EFTA00028060.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 11, 2020. It orders the United States to submit an amicus brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with the criminal case United States v. Maxwell (No. 20-3061) and adjourns a hearing previously scheduled for September 22, 2020.
EFTA00023011.pdf
This document is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021. It affirms previous District Court orders from December 2020 and March 2021 that denied Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The court also addresses a complaint made during oral arguments regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific concerns to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00000155.tif
This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated November 25, 2024, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's (AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1) petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc. The order was issued by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the Court, following a session held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00015118.jpg
This is a legal letter from Neil S. Binder of Binder & Schwartz LLP to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. The letter, submitted under seal, addresses the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury materials that reference the firm's client (whose name is redacted), arguing for the continued maintenance of grand jury secrecy based on established precedent and the lack of justification for special circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00015103.jpg
This is a legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from attorney Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to U.S. District Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The letter is written on behalf of victim Annie Farmer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter heavily criticizes the Department of Justice for failing to pursue further criminal investigations and notes that Maxwell is attempting to negotiate a pardon.
DOJ-OGR-00014850.jpg
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00001466.jpg
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders denying Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001465.jpg
This is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated June 2, 2021. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release and her alternative request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the conditions of her confinement. The order was issued by Judges Leval, Lohier, and Sullivan.
DOJ-OGR-00001432.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001425.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that concerns raised by Maxwell's counsel regarding sleep deprivation during incarceration should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001406.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation during incarceration should be directed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001405.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity