This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the timing of the jury charge draft and estimates for closing arguments (summations). Ms. Sternheim makes a remark about the government getting 'two cracks' at closing arguments.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Discussing scheduling and closing arguments with the judge. Likely Bobbi Sternheim representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, discussing jury charges and scheduling.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Asking about the timing of the jury charge draft. Likely Maurene Comey.
|
| Hyppolite | Witness (implied) |
Name appears in the header 'Hyppolite - direct', suggesting a witness who testified prior to this procedural discussion.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp.
|
|
| The Government |
Referred to by Ms. Sternheim regarding closing arguments structure.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied court location (SDNY) based on reporter's name.
|
"Is there any sense of when we might expect a draft of the jury charge?"Source
"That's tonight's project for the 9 a.m. conference."Source
"I prefer actually getting two cracks at it, like the government, but we'll be sparse."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,077 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document