DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg

470 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 470 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the timing of the jury charge draft and estimates for closing arguments (summations). Ms. Sternheim makes a remark about the government getting 'two cracks' at closing arguments.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Discussing scheduling and closing arguments with the judge. Likely Bobbi Sternheim representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, discussing jury charges and scheduling.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Asking about the timing of the jury charge draft. Likely Maurene Comey.
Hyppolite Witness (implied)
Name appears in the header 'Hyppolite - direct', suggesting a witness who testified prior to this procedural discussion.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp.
The Government
Referred to by Ms. Sternheim regarding closing arguments structure.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding jury charges and closing arguments.
Courtroom
Tomorrow (relative to transcript)
9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge.
Courtroom
The Court Counsel

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied court location (SDNY) based on reporter's name.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Sternheim Attorney-Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript
Ms. Comey Attorney-Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript

Key Quotes (3)

"Is there any sense of when we might expect a draft of the jury charge?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #1
"That's tonight's project for the 9 a.m. conference."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #2
"I prefer actually getting two cracks at it, like the government, but we'll be sparse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,077 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 243 of 246 2538
LCGVMAX7 Hyppolite - direct
1 rights.
2 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would ask that we wait until
3 tomorrow please.
4 THE COURT: Okay.
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
6 THE COURT: We will do that.
7 MS. COMEY: Just one quick question, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Yes.
9 MS. COMEY: Is there any sense of when we might expect
10 a draft of the jury charge?
11 THE COURT: It will be tomorrow.
12 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: That's tonight's project for the 9 a.m.
14 conference.
15 I don't suppose anyone has a time estimate of
16 closings?
17 MS. STERNHEIM: What's a closing, Judge?
18 I don't think we have an idea yet. As soon as we
19 do --
20 THE COURT: Do you prefer "summations"?
21 MS. STERNHEIM: I prefer that, too. I prefer actually
22 getting two cracks at it, like the government, but we'll be
23 sparse. I don't think we're in a position to inform the Court
24 yet.
25 THE COURT: Okay. But presumably we're looking at
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016726

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document