DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg

556 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / legal ruling (excerpt)
File Size: 556 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) detailing a judge's rulings on objections to a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) regarding a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The text discusses the defendant's role in grooming victims 'Jane' and 'Kate' for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically overruling an objection to exclude Kate's testimony about the defendant's recruitment methods. It also addresses a dispute regarding evidence of Epstein paying for a trip to Thailand for an individual named 'Annie'.

People (6)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant (Likely Ghislaine Maxwell)
Subject of the sentencing hearing; described as identifying and introducing young girls to Epstein for sexualized mas...
Jeffrey Epstein Co-conspirator
Mentioned as the recipient of 'sexualized massages' and illegal sex acts facilitated by the defendant.
Jane Victim/Witness
Trial testimony established defendant made her comfortable and encouraged her to engage in illegal sex acts with Epst...
Kate Witness/Victim
Subject of PSR Paragraphs 39-45; described as providing testimony on defendant's recruitment methods. Was above age o...
Annie Witness/Victim
Subject of Paragraph 54; involved in a trip to Thailand where payment by Epstein is disputed.
The Court/Judge Judge
Speaker (referred to as 'I'); ruling on objections to the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

06/29/2023 (Document Date)
Court ruling on objections to Pre-Sentence Report (PSR).
Courtroom
The Defendant The Judge
Unknown (Historical)
Trip to Thailand involving Annie.
Thailand

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of a trip taken by Annie; dispute over whether Epstein paid for it.

Relationships (3)

The Defendant Co-conspirator/Recruiter Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant identified and introduced young girls to Epstein for sexualized massages.
The Defendant Groomer/Victim Jane
Defendant took steps to make Jane comfortable and encouraged illegal sex acts.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate/Benefactor (Disputed) Annie
Dispute over whether Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand.

Key Quotes (4)

"credible trial testimony established that the defendant took steps to make Jane comfortable and encouraged her to engage in illegal sex acts with Epstein."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg
Quote #1
"testimony revealed additional details of the defendant's method of identifying and introducing to Epstein young girls for sexualized massages."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg
Quote #2
"Her testimony also established the defendant's knowledge of the sexualized nature of massages with Epstein."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg
Quote #3
"the defendant objects that there's no evidence that Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021556.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,604 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page126 of 217
SA-380
11
M6SQmax1
1 credible trial testimony established that the defendant took
2 steps to make Jane comfortable and encouraged her to engage in
3 illegal sex acts with Epstein.
4 Paragraphs 39 to 45 which describe specific conduct
5 involving Kate, I think the specific request here -- well,
6 first, was that it should be removed from the PSR because Kate
7 was not a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment, and
8 then, alternatively, that it be moved to a different paragraph
9 with a heading offense behavior not part of relevant conduct.
10 I don't see that this is necessary. I overrule the objection.
11 Conduct involving Kate may be considered at sentencing her
12 testimony revealed additional details of the defendant's method
13 of identifying and introducing to Epstein young girls for
14 sexualized massages. Her testimony also established the
15 defendant's knowledge of the sexualized nature of massages with
16 Epstein.
17 Paragraph 43, the defendant contends this paragraph
18 should include a sentence that Kate was above the age of
19 consent at all times. I think the paragraph says that Kate was
20 age 17 or above at all relevant times, and I have no objection
21 to including that she was above the age of consent at all times
22 based on the trial evidence, so I will make that change to
23 paragraph 43 of the PSR.
24 Paragraph 54, the defendant objects that there's no
25 evidence that Epstein paid for Annie's trip to Thailand. That
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. • • •
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021556

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document