DOJ-OGR-00000445.jpg
516 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
516 KB
Summary
This document is the first page of a legal letter filed on July 16, 2019, by attorney Marc Fernich to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case US v. Epstein. The letter serves to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail in response to government arguments made the previous day. Fernich argues against the government's reliance on the 'rebuttable remand presumption' connected to 18 USC § 1591 charges, contending in a footnote that the statute does not cover the specific conduct at issue.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Fernich | Attorney |
Author of the letter, representing Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Richard M. Berman | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, USDJ-SDNY.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Subject of the bail request and criminal case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Law Office of Marc Fernich |
Legal firm representing the defendant.
|
|
| USDJ-SDNY |
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
|
|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution/US Attorney's office.
|
Timeline (2 events)
July 15, 2019
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the Law Office of Marc Fernich.
|
|
|
Address of the Court/Judge Berman.
|
Relationships (2)
Fernich writes on behalf of Epstein regarding his bail request.
Formal legal correspondence addressed to the Judge.
Key Quotes (3)
"we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein’s request for bail."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000445.jpg
Quote #1
"Stripped to its core, the government’s position... distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand presumption"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000445.jpg
Quote #2
"Epstein contends that § 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000445.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,071 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 9
LAW OFFICE OF
MARC FERNICH
MARC FERNICH
MARC FERNICH maf@fernichlaw.com
ALSO ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS
ALSO ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS
810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
212-446-2346
FAX: 212-459-2299
www.fernichlaw.com
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
212-446-2346
FAX: 212-459-2299
www.fernichlaw.com
July 16, 2019
BY ECF
Hon. Richard M. Berman
USDJ-SDNY
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007
USDJ-SDNY
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007
Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY)
Dear Judge Berman:
In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made
yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein’s
request for bail.
yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein’s
request for bail.
First, make no mistake about the crux of the government’s
detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its core,
the government’s position – as urged in its letters and echoed again
yesterday – distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand
presumption (connected with 18 USC § 1591 charges)¹ plus Epstein’s
detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its core,
the government’s position – as urged in its letters and echoed again
yesterday – distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand
presumption (connected with 18 USC § 1591 charges)¹ plus Epstein’s
¹ To be clear, Epstein contends that § 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption
do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual
do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual
DOJ-OGR-00000445
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document