HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
1.31 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / civil complaint (page 7)
File Size:
1.31 MB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (likely a civil complaint) involving Plaintiff Jean-Luc Brunel and his agency MC2. It alleges that Jeffrey Epstein instructed Brunel to leave the Palm Beach area and travel to Europe and Asia specifically to avoid/delay a deposition in a criminal case against Epstein, which the document characterizes as obstruction of justice. It further details that the deposition was scheduled for November 2009 but was never completed due to an attorney's family emergency, and claims Brunel suffered psychological distress and reputational harm due to his association with Epstein.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jean-Luc Brunel | Plaintiff |
Owner of MC2 agency; alleges he was advised by Epstein to flee the US to avoid deposition; claims psychological distr...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant / Subject |
Alleged to have instructed Brunel to leave Palm Beach to obstruct justice; described as involved in illegal activitie...
|
| Brunel's Attorney | Legal Counsel |
Had a family medical emergency that caused the final delay of the deposition.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Plaintiff MC2 |
Modeling agency owned and operated by Plaintiff Brunel; claims reputational harm.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
November 2009
Scheduled deposition of Plaintiff Brunel (which was subsequently delayed due to attorney's family emergency).
Unknown
Prior to November 2009
Brunel travels to Europe and Asia to delay deposition on Epstein's advice.
Europe and Asia
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location Epstein allegedly told Brunel to leave.
|
|
|
Destination Brunel traveled to in order to avoid deposition.
|
|
|
Destination Brunel traveled to in order to avoid deposition.
|
Relationships (2)
Document states Epstein told Brunel to leave the country to avoid deposition in Epstein's criminal case.
Text states 'Plaintiff Brunel continues to own and operate Plaintiff MC2 to this day'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Plaintiff Brunel was also told by Epstein to leave the Palm Beach area in anticipation of a deposition of Plaintiff Brunel in a criminal case against Epstein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
Quote #1
"On the direct advice of Epstein, Plaintiff Brunel went to Europe and Asia for a period of time. This was done for the sole purpose of delaying Plaintiff Brunel’s deposition."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
Quote #2
"This was a blatant example of obstruction of justice in the criminal case."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein was solely responsible for telling Plaintiff Brunel to leave the area."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
Quote #4
"Epstein’s conduct was the direct cause of Plaintiff Brunel’s psychological state."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,995 characters)
32. Plaintiff Brunel continues to own and operate Plaintiff MC2 to this day, their names
never having been cleared from the massive and totally negative media coverage involving
Epstein and his illegal activities. Plaintiffs have been, and continue to be, irreparably harmed by
these false internet-based links to Epstein. (Exhibits R & S attached).
never having been cleared from the massive and totally negative media coverage involving
Epstein and his illegal activities. Plaintiffs have been, and continue to be, irreparably harmed by
these false internet-based links to Epstein. (Exhibits R & S attached).
33. Second, Plaintiff Brunel was also told by Epstein to leave the Palm Beach area in
anticipation of a deposition of Plaintiff Brunel in a criminal case against Epstein. On the direct
advice of Epstein, Plaintiff Brunel went to Europe and Asia for a period of time. This was done
for the sole purpose of delaying Plaintiff Brunel's deposition.
anticipation of a deposition of Plaintiff Brunel in a criminal case against Epstein. On the direct
advice of Epstein, Plaintiff Brunel went to Europe and Asia for a period of time. This was done
for the sole purpose of delaying Plaintiff Brunel's deposition.
34. As a direct result of Plaintiff Brunel's travels, his deposition was delayed twice. When it
was finally scheduled for November 2009, Plaintiff Brunel was in fact available (Exhibit L
attached). However, a medical emergency in the family of his attorney further delayed this
deposition (Exhibit M attached). It was never rescheduled and he was never deposed.
was finally scheduled for November 2009, Plaintiff Brunel was in fact available (Exhibit L
attached). However, a medical emergency in the family of his attorney further delayed this
deposition (Exhibit M attached). It was never rescheduled and he was never deposed.
35. This was a blatant example of obstruction of justice in the criminal case. Epstein was
solely responsible for telling Plaintiff Brunel to leave the area. Plaintiff Brunel lost a huge
opportunity to clear his name, and that of his agency, Plaintiff MC2.
solely responsible for telling Plaintiff Brunel to leave the area. Plaintiff Brunel lost a huge
opportunity to clear his name, and that of his agency, Plaintiff MC2.
36. Third, as a result of all of the facts stated above, Plaintiff Brunel was under tremendous
psychological pressure throughout this period of time.
psychological pressure throughout this period of time.
37. This psychological pressure resulted in Plaintiff Brunel avoiding business contacts as set
forth above. This pressure also directly caused Plaintiff Brunel to avoid certain social contacts
during this period of time.
forth above. This pressure also directly caused Plaintiff Brunel to avoid certain social contacts
during this period of time.
38. Plaintiff Brunel became extremely withdrawn and anxious at this time.
39. Epstein's conduct was the direct cause of Plaintiff Brunel's psychological state. The
press was reporting extensively on the lurid details of Epstein's illegal activities with the under-
aged girls.
press was reporting extensively on the lurid details of Epstein's illegal activities with the under-
aged girls.
7
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document