Palm Beach area
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000786.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, outlines the U.S. Government's argument against granting pretrial release to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The Government asserts he is an extraordinary flight risk due to his wealth, access to private planes, and the long potential prison sentence he faces. The document also provides background on Epstein's past legal issues, including a 2005 investigation, a 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and a 2008 guilty plea in Florida, contrasting the prosecution's view with the defense's claim that Epstein is not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00030594.jpg
A handwritten phone message slip dated August 20, 2005, at 8:45 PM. The message is for 'J.E.' from 'Tony,' who requested a return call at the number 561/790-5475. The slip is signed by 'J.' and bears the DOJ identifier DOJ-OGR-00030594.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016571.jpg
This document is page 18 of the Code Enforcement Board Meeting Minutes from July 17, 2008. The Board discusses a request for a fine reduction regarding a property represented by Mr. Lynch and associated with builder Mr. Wagner, involving a $35,000 fine on a $10.6 million home. The discussion centers on whether the builder was ignorant of code time limits and the daily fine rate ($250.00/day).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012132.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008, arguing that a new New York-based Grand Jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein violates his September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the NPA protects associates like Leslie Groff and [Redacted], and asserts that the new investigation is a 'fishing expedition' lacking federal jurisdiction (internet luring, travel, etc.). The defense claims that statements from three principal accusers (names redacted) actually undermine the prosecution's case and deny essential elements required for federal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011918.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (likely a civil complaint) involving Plaintiff Jean-Luc Brunel and his agency MC2. It alleges that Jeffrey Epstein instructed Brunel to leave the Palm Beach area and travel to Europe and Asia specifically to avoid/delay a deposition in a criminal case against Epstein, which the document characterizes as obstruction of justice. It further details that the deposition was scheduled for November 2009 but was never completed due to an attorney's family emergency, and claims Brunel suffered psychological distress and reputational harm due to his association with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021687.jpg
This FBI internal memo from March 12, 2011, requests travel authority for two Miami agents to go abroad (location redacted) to interview a US citizen victim identified in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The document summarizes the investigation's origin in July 2006, noting Epstein's method of procuring underage girls from local high schools for paid sexual acts ($200-$1000) via other underage recruiters. It specifically details a victim who was recruited while working at a redacted location.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity