DOJ-OGR-00017443.jpg
533 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
533 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination) of a pilot named Visoski. The testimony focuses on flight manifest procedures, specifically the requirement to list names if known and the lack of necessity to weigh passengers for the specific large aircraft (Gulf Stream and Boeing) flown for Epstein, as opposed to smaller planes.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Visoski | Witness / Pilot |
Being cross-examined regarding flight manifest procedures and aircraft weight considerations.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Employer / Aircraft Owner |
Referenced as 'Epstein', the person for whom Visoski flew planes.
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Questioner (Q) |
Conducting the cross-examination of Visoski.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the document stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Filing of court document 743 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Southern District of New York (implied by header/footer)
Relationships (1)
Q. But for the planes you were flying for Epstein...
Key Quotes (2)
"Obviously, if you did know the name or it was a person you recognized from before, you would put their name on the manifest? A. Absolutely."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017443.jpg
Quote #1
"But for the planes you were flying for Epstein, particularly the Gulf Stream and the Boeing, you didn't need to know the weight for those planes; right? A. It was not necessary, no."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017443.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,305 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 247 209
LBUCmax3 Visoski - cross
LBUCmax3 Visoski - cross
1 female if we didn't catch a name.
2 Q. Obviously, if you did know the name or it was a person you
3 recognized from before, you would put their name on the
4 manifest?
5 A. Absolutely.
6 Q. And you said that it was important to keep track of the
7 head count, which is why you wanted to know how many people
8 were on the plane; right?
9 A. That is correct.
10 Q. Now, you said weight was also a consideration; is that
11 right?
12 A. It's a consideration on some aircraft, not the kind that
13 we're flying, but it's something that should take into account
14 or as far as how heavy luggage is. But it is a consideration
15 as a pilot to know how much something weighs as far as luggage
16 and/or passenger.
17 Q. And that's if you're flying a small plane, for example, you
18 need to know the weight of the passengers?
19 A. Exactly, yes.
20 Q. But for the planes you were flying for Epstein,
21 particularly the Gulf Stream and the Boeing, you didn't need to
22 know the weight for those planes; right?
23 A. It was not necessary, no. It's, like I said, more of a
24 head count, but yeah, it's not a factor in these type of
25 aircraft.
2 Q. Obviously, if you did know the name or it was a person you
3 recognized from before, you would put their name on the
4 manifest?
5 A. Absolutely.
6 Q. And you said that it was important to keep track of the
7 head count, which is why you wanted to know how many people
8 were on the plane; right?
9 A. That is correct.
10 Q. Now, you said weight was also a consideration; is that
11 right?
12 A. It's a consideration on some aircraft, not the kind that
13 we're flying, but it's something that should take into account
14 or as far as how heavy luggage is. But it is a consideration
15 as a pilot to know how much something weighs as far as luggage
16 and/or passenger.
17 Q. And that's if you're flying a small plane, for example, you
18 need to know the weight of the passengers?
19 A. Exactly, yes.
20 Q. But for the planes you were flying for Epstein,
21 particularly the Gulf Stream and the Boeing, you didn't need to
22 know the weight for those planes; right?
23 A. It was not necessary, no. It's, like I said, more of a
24 head count, but yeah, it's not a factor in these type of
25 aircraft.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017443
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document