DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
542 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
542 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Maxwell). It features the cross-examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Dr. Rocchio's definition of a 'child' (age of consent vs. under 18) and references a prior interview with the government on April 9, 2021, documented in '3500 material' (Jencks Act disclosures).
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness / Expert |
Being cross-examined regarding definitions used in previous government interviews.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, ruling on discovery motions, and asking about 3500 material.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced as having interviewed Dr. Rocchio previously.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (2 events)
April 9, 2021
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and court reporters.
|
Relationships (1)
Reference to an interview on April 9, 2021.
Key Quotes (3)
"I would define 'child' as someone under the age of 18."Source
— Dr. Rocchio
(Defining the term 'child' during cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you have a 3500?"Source
— The Court
(Judge asking if the defense has the Jencks Act material (witness statements) related to the interview.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm not sure, absent some specific motion for discovery, that I've ever seen expert time records turned over."Source
— The Court
(Denying a request or commenting on the production of expert time records.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,394 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 101 of 158 101
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross
1 for testimony.
2 THE COURT: You can submit authority on that. I mean,
3 certainly appropriate grounds for cross. I'm not sure, absent
4 some specific motion for discovery, that I've ever seen expert
5 time records turned over.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.
7 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
8 Q. Dr. Rocchio, I'd like to talk to you about some of the
9 terms that you've been using here today. The first one I want
10 to ask you about is the definition of "child." Do you recall,
11 when you discussed this case with the government on April 9th
12 of this year, that you defined "child" for the government as
13 someone under the age of consent? Do you recall that?
14 A. I don't specifically recall that, no, I'm sorry.
15 Q. Is that a definition of "child," someone under the age of
16 consent?
17 A. I would -- I would define "child" as someone under the age
18 of 18.
19 Q. Well, I'm looking at page 3 of the interview notes produced
20 in connection with your interview on April 9, 2021.
21 THE COURT: Do you have a 3500?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do, your Honor. I'm at page
23 3502-004. That's the beginning of this interview, April 9,
24 2021. And if we go to -- well, that's the page 3 of that
25 interview. The top of the page.
2 THE COURT: You can submit authority on that. I mean,
3 certainly appropriate grounds for cross. I'm not sure, absent
4 some specific motion for discovery, that I've ever seen expert
5 time records turned over.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.
7 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
8 Q. Dr. Rocchio, I'd like to talk to you about some of the
9 terms that you've been using here today. The first one I want
10 to ask you about is the definition of "child." Do you recall,
11 when you discussed this case with the government on April 9th
12 of this year, that you defined "child" for the government as
13 someone under the age of consent? Do you recall that?
14 A. I don't specifically recall that, no, I'm sorry.
15 Q. Is that a definition of "child," someone under the age of
16 consent?
17 A. I would -- I would define "child" as someone under the age
18 of 18.
19 Q. Well, I'm looking at page 3 of the interview notes produced
20 in connection with your interview on April 9, 2021.
21 THE COURT: Do you have a 3500?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do, your Honor. I'm at page
23 3502-004. That's the beginning of this interview, April 9,
24 2021. And if we go to -- well, that's the page 3 of that
25 interview. The top of the page.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014977
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document