DOJ-OGR-00000255.tif
21.2 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (petition for certiorari/conclusion section)
File Size:
21.2 KB
Summary
This document is the conclusion section of a legal filing, likely a petition for certiorari, dated July 28, 2025. It argues that the case provides an ideal opportunity for the Court to resolve a split regarding federal plea bargains, particularly in the context of federal prosecution related to "Epstein's circle." The document is submitted by DAVID OSCAR MARKUS and MONA MARKUS of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DAVID OSCAR MARKUS | Counsel of Record |
Submitted the document
|
| MONA MARKUS | Counsel |
Associated with MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
| Epstein | Subject of prosecution |
Mentioned in the context of federal prosecution
|
| Petitioner | Party in the case |
Entitled to enforce a deal, and for whom certiorari is requested
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MARKUS/MOSS PLLC |
Law firm representing the Petitioner
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by the document number 'DOJ-OGR-00000255'
|
Timeline (1 events)
July 28, 2025
Submission of a legal document (petition for certiorari)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
|
|
Location of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
Relationships (3)
Both listed as counsel for MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
Listed as 'Counsel of Record' and 'Counsel for Petitioner'
Listed as 'Counsel for Petitioner'
Key Quotes (3)
"'This case is an ideal vehicle for resolving the split over this important and recurring question.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000255.tif
Quote #1
"'It is hard to imagine a more compelling scenario for this Court's review: for decades now, the same federal promise has yielded opposite results in different jurisdictions, undermining the uniformity of federal law and the integrity of plea bargains nationwide. This Court's review is warranted.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000255.tif
Quote #2
"'For the foregoing reasons, this Court should grant the petition for certiorari.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000255.tif
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (876 characters)
11
others to prevent any federal prosecution of Epstein's
circle. Whether or not this was wise, it was the deal,
and Petitioner is entitled to enforce it.
III. This case is an ideal vehicle for resolving
the split over this important and recurring
question.
It is hard to imagine a more compelling scenario for
this Court's review: for decades now, the same federal
promise has yielded opposite results in different
jurisdictions, undermining the uniformity of federal
law and the integrity of plea bargains nationwide. This
Court's review is warranted.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, this Court should grant
the petition for certiorari.
July 28, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID OSCAR MARKUS
Counsel of Record
MONA MARKUS
MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
40 N.W. Third Street
Penthouse One
Miami, FL 33128
(305) 379-6667
dmarkus@markuslaw.com
Counsel for Petitioner
DOJ-OGR-00000255
others to prevent any federal prosecution of Epstein's
circle. Whether or not this was wise, it was the deal,
and Petitioner is entitled to enforce it.
III. This case is an ideal vehicle for resolving
the split over this important and recurring
question.
It is hard to imagine a more compelling scenario for
this Court's review: for decades now, the same federal
promise has yielded opposite results in different
jurisdictions, undermining the uniformity of federal
law and the integrity of plea bargains nationwide. This
Court's review is warranted.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, this Court should grant
the petition for certiorari.
July 28, 2025
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID OSCAR MARKUS
Counsel of Record
MONA MARKUS
MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
40 N.W. Third Street
Penthouse One
Miami, FL 33128
(305) 379-6667
dmarkus@markuslaw.com
Counsel for Petitioner
DOJ-OGR-00000255
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document