| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Accused coconspirator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Involved in a scheme together |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged co conspirator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Criminal conspiracy collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mona Markus
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A second superseding and ultimately operative indictment charged petitioner with six offenses rel... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Petitioner's conviction for conspiring to transport minors for sexual activity, transporting mino... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Petitioner's sentencing to 240 months imprisonment and five years of supervised release | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Petitioner's coordination, facilitation, and contribution to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of nu... | Palm Beach, Florida; New Yo... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Petitioner moved to dismiss indictment arguing Epstein's NPA barred her prosecution as a coconspi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury trial for Petitioner | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | N/A | District court entered judgment on three counts, dismissed two, and sentenced petitioner to 240 m... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision, rejecting petitioner's contention that E... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-28 | N/A | Submission of a legal document (petition for certiorari) | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Petitioner was tried on nonperjury counts, jury found her guilty on five counts. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | A grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned an indictment charging petitioner with... | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is the conclusion section of a legal filing, likely a petition for certiorari, dated July 28, 2025. It argues that the case provides an ideal opportunity for the Court to resolve a split regarding federal plea bargains, particularly in the context of federal prosecution related to "Epstein's circle." The document is submitted by DAVID OSCAR MARKUS and MONA MARKUS of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing arguing that a 'Petitioner' should be covered by an immunity clause in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein's offenses. It asserts that the NPA's broad language intended to cover unnamed co-conspirators, including individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell who were known to Epstein's circle or might later be identified. The argument cites legal precedents to support the Petitioner's claim for immunity.
This document discusses the legal context surrounding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell and the plea agreement made by Epstein. It highlights the government's intent to protect Epstein's associates from federal prosecution through a broad 'including but not limited to' clause, and notes the government's concerns about the strength of its case and victims' willingness to proceed to trial, referencing the OPR report.
This document details a legal case where a 'Petitioner' attempted to dismiss an indictment, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred her prosecution as a coconspirator. Both the district court and the court of appeals rejected this argument, finding that the NPA only bound the Florida USAO and did not preclude the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Maxwell for related offenses. The Petitioner was found guilty on multiple counts and sentenced to 240 months imprisonment.
This document outlines legal proceedings related to Epstein and a petitioner. It details the terms of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein, his 2008 guilty plea in Florida for two offenses, and his subsequent incarceration. The document also describes a 2019 indictment of Epstein for sex trafficking minors by the Southern District of New York and a 2020 indictment of a petitioner for offenses related to a scheme with Epstein, including facilitating sexual activity by minors and perjury.
This document outlines the conviction and sentencing of a petitioner for their role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse network between approximately 1994 and 2004. The petitioner was found guilty of conspiring to transport minors for sexual activity, transporting minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking of a minor, receiving a 240-month prison sentence. The document details the pattern of abuse involving identifying vulnerable girls, isolating them, and paying them for sexualized massages, which took place at Epstein's residences in Palm Beach, Florida, and New York City.
This is page 3 of a USCIS Notice of Action (Form I-797) regarding a petition for an O-1 nonimmigrant visa (extraordinary ability in the arts). The government is challenging the petition, stating that the beneficiary's documented success and proposed duties—specifically scouting talent for MC2 Models and managing agency operations—demonstrate ability in 'business' rather than 'the arts.' The document requests a copy of the employment contract and better explanation of the engagement to prove it qualifies as an artistic endeavor.
USCIS is requesting contracts and clarification on the nature of the event/engagement. They argue the beneficiary's duties relate to business operations of a modeling agency, not 'the arts'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity