A court transcript excerpt from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a discussion about witness 'Jane'. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger raises a concern about a potential undisclosed statement from May 2019. Prosecutor Ms. Comey clarifies that the witness was approached by the FBI in May 2019 but declined to speak, and her first substantive interview did not occur until September 2019.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Subject of the direct examination and discussion regarding prior statements to the FBI.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Argued that a statement from May 2019 had not been disclosed to the defense.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Stated she was at the first meeting in September 2019 and denied having notes from May.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Clarified the timeline, explaining that the witness was approached by the FBI in May 2019 but declined to be intervie...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding admissible evidence and witness recollection.
|
| FBI Agents | Law Enforcement |
Approached the witness in May 2019.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Attempted to interview the witness in May 2019; conducted substantive interview in September 2019.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Produced the transcript.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00017590).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporter's name.
|
"If she did, in fact, give a statement to law enforcement in May of 2019, it hasn't been disclosed to us."Source
"I believe before the September 2019 interview, FBI agents approached this witness and asked her if she was willing to be interviewed. She declined."Source
"But she was not substantively interviewed and did not give substantive statements until September of 2019."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document