DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg

396 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 396 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (page 335) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Edelstein is being questioned regarding their role in the defense of David Parse, specifically concerning email exchanges involving Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou regarding Robert Conrad. The testimony also touches on the witness's involvement in voir dire (jury selection) and the receipt of a 'Catherine Conrad letter' or dossier.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
The person being questioned in the transcript.
Robert Conrad Subject of email
Identified as 'the father' in email exchanges discussed.
Theresa Trzaskoma Email participant
Identified by Edelstein as being on the email exchanges.
David Benhamou Email participant
Identified by Edelstein as being on the email exchanges.
David Parse Defendant
The trial mentioned is described as 'the defense of David Parse'.
Catherine Conrad Subject of document
Mentioned in relation to a 'Catherine Conrad letter'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00009396.

Timeline (2 events)

Unknown (past)
Trial of David Parse
Unknown (Court)
Unknown (prior to voir dire)
Meetings discussing jurors
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Robert Conrad Familial (Implied) Catherine Conrad
Context suggests connection via 'Catherine Conrad letter' and Robert Conrad being 'the father'.
Edelstein Legal Defense David Parse
Edelstein discusses his role in the 'defense of David Parse'.

Key Quotes (4)

"I believe Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved in various parts of it."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg
Quote #2
"I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors were discussed prior to voir dire"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg
Quote #3
"I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,224 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 107 of 130
A-5792
335
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 trial, correct?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Do you remember who was on those e-mail exchanges that
4 identified Robert Conrad as the father?
5 A. I believe Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou.
6 Q. Were you informed of that at the time?
7 A. No.
8 Q. By the way, what was your role, what was your principal
9 duty in connection with the trial, the defense of David Parse?
10 A. I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved
11 in various parts of it. I focused on the opening and the
12 closing statements, the expert testimony, several of the
13 witnesses.
14 Q. Voir dire?
15 A. No.
16 Q. Did you assist in voir dire?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Not at all?
19 A. Well, I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors
20 were discussed prior to voir dire and then my role really at
21 that time was to focus on the opening statement.
22 Q. Now, you received the dossier from, well, the link to the
23 dossier and examined it, are you saying after you received a
24 copy of the Catherine Conrad letter?
25 A. I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier. I received the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009396

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document