Event Details
Unknown (past)
Description
Trial of David Parse
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
| BARRY H. BERKE | person | 10 | View Entity |
| David Parse | person | 96 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00009396.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (page 335) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Edelstein is being questioned regarding their role in the defense of David Parse, specifically concerning email exchanges involving Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou regarding Robert Conrad. The testimony also touches on the witness's involvement in voir dire (jury selection) and the receipt of a 'Catherine Conrad letter' or dossier.
DOJ-OGR-00010107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on March 21, 2022, featuring the direct examination of attorney Barry H. Berke by Mr. Shechtman. Berke testifies about his employment history at the law firm Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel and the Federal Defenders office, and confirms he was a lawyer present in the courtroom during the trial of David Parse. The document bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp, suggesting it was released as part of a Department of Justice records request.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Defendant David Parse’s Motion For Judgment Of Acquittal Pursuant To Rule 29
2011-06-07
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.
0012-05-01
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event