DOJ-OGR-00020983.jpg

485 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal ruling
File Size: 485 KB
Summary

This document is a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated April 1, 2022, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial, concluding that 'Juror 50' harbored no bias, orders a presentence investigation report, and confirms sentencing is scheduled for June 28, 2022.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan United States Circuit Judge
Judge issuing the order denying a new trial and scheduling sentencing.
The Defendant Defendant
Subject of the order (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), whose motion for a new trial was de...
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a bias inquiry; court concluded they harbored no bias.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Implied by the case number and judge's signature (SDNY).
The Government
Prosecution, referenced regarding a January 10, 2022 letter.
DOJ
Department of Justice, referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00020983.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-04-01
Court Order Issued
New York, New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2022-06-28
Sentencing Scheduled
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where the order was signed/issued.

Relationships (1)

Alison J. Nathan Legal/Judicial The Defendant
Judge Nathan issuing rulings on the Defendant's motions.

Key Quotes (4)

"Juror 50 harbored no bias toward the Defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020983.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 is therefore DENIED."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020983.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court orders the preparation of the presentence investigation report."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020983.jpg
Quote #3
"Sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020983.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,462 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page157 of 221
A-357
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 653 Filed 04/01/22 Page 40 of 40
selection process was highly unfortunate, but not deliberate. The Court further concludes that
Juror 50 harbored no bias toward the Defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror.
The requirements for a new trial under McDonough are not satisfied. The Defendant’s motion
for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 is therefore DENIED.
The Court orders the preparation of the presentence investigation report.
With respect to Counts 7 and 8, the Court hereby excludes time under the Speedy Trial
Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), from today’s date through April 22, 2022. The Court finds that
the ends of justice served by granting this exclusion from speedy trial computations outweigh the
interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial on these counts because the pending
post-trial motions affect the scheduling considerations set forth in the Government’s January 10,
2022 letter. See Dkt. No. 574. The Defendant consents to this exclusion. Dkt. No. 650.
The Court will rule on the Defendant’s remaining post-verdict motions in due course.
Sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. This resolves docket numbers 613, 614, 642,
650, and 651.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 1, 2022
New York, New York
Alison J. Nathan
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States Circuit Judge
Sitting by Designation
40
DOJ-OGR-00020983

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document