Event Details

Legal correspondence from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to the US Attorney's Office regarding objections to hearsay statements. The defense objects to statements made by Epstein to employees (specifically CC-1) about Maxwell 'finding girls' and instructions regarding computer removal, arguing these occurred post-conspiracy and constitute 'idle chatter' rather than furtherance of a conspiracy. The letter also addresses the scope of 'minor victims' referenced in the indictment versus those in Florida investigations.

Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 3, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court approves the defendant's proposed redactions for letters dated November 25 and 30 regarding a renewed bail motion, citing the privacy interests of individuals mentioned in the letters. The court denies the request for an in camera conference but allows written submissions with tailored redactions and orders the parties to schedule briefing for the renewed bail motion.

This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on May 4, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein opposes the court's potential order to consolidate multiple civil lawsuits (filed by various 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs) for all discovery purposes, arguing that while consolidating depositions is acceptable, full consolidation would confuse distinct facts and defenses unique to each case. The filing lists numerous related case numbers and requests clarification on how consolidation would operate regarding motion practice.

This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. It outlines the agreed-upon timeline for the exchange of evidence, including initial disclosures, medical records, and expert reports. The filing identifies the key subjects of discovery as Epstein's alleged torts against the plaintiff, the liability of the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff's damages.

A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffery Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-CIV), entered on March 25, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted the Defendant's unopposed motion to exceed the page limitation on his responsive pleading by no more than eight pages.

A court order from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated April 28, 2023, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted the Government's motion to file an oversized opposition brief (up to 20,000 words) and set a new briefing schedule with deadlines in June and July 2023.

This is the final page (16) of a court order issued by US District Judge Martha Vazquez on February 6, 2021. The order grants Mr. Robertson's motion for immediate release (Doc 274) to allow him to prepare for an upcoming trial with his defense team, citing the need for preparation time and potential quarantine at 'La Pasada.' The judge simultaneously denies the government's emergency motion to stay the release order.

This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 16, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order confirms that Maxwell's legal counsel has set a date of October 22, 2020, to file their brief and explicitly orders that this deadline be met under threat of potential financial sanctions.

A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated October 9, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The order grants the Appellant's (Maxwell) motion to file an unredacted reply brief under seal without prejudice.

This document is Page 3 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated October 15, 2021. It contains a submission by the US Attorney's office followed by a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement from the Judge (Alison J. Nathan). The Judge denies a specific order requested by the defense but establishes a firm expectation that Maxwell should receive legal mail within approximately one business day to ensure she can prepare for trial.

This document is a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated April 1, 2022, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial, concluding that 'Juror 50' harbored no bias, orders a presentence investigation report, and confirms sentencing is scheduled for June 28, 2022.

This is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, but the appellate court directed those specific concerns back to the District Court.