HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg

1.92 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
8
Organizations
6
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 1.92 MB
Summary

An email thread between NYT reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein regarding a story on Saudi Royal family finances. Thomas asks for contacts and insights, specifically mentioning a rumor about a $200 billion withdrawal by SAMA. Epstein responds with political commentary on the US and Saudi Arabia. Notably, Thomas explicitly asks Epstein in a postscript if his previous reporting can secure him a meeting with Bill Gates.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Landon Thomas Jr. Financial Reporter, New York Times
Sender of the initial inquiry and follow-up emails; asking Epstein for information on Saudi finances and a meeting wi...
Jeffrey E. (Epstein) Recipient/Respondent
Providing commentary on Saudi Arabia, US politics, and responding to Thomas's inquiries via email address jeevacation...
Bill Gates Microsoft Co-founder (referenced)
Referenced as 'Gates'; Landon Thomas Jr. asks Epstein if his story on Abraaj can get him a meeting with Gates.
Bin Salman Saudi Royal (MBS)
Mentioned by Epstein in the context of the Saudi Royal family leadership.
Donald Trump Presidential Candidate (at the time)
Mentioned by Epstein: 'trump has tapped in' regarding public anger.
Unnamed CEO CEO of big finance firm
Source for Landon Thomas Jr. regarding the $200 billion withdrawal.

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
New York Times
Employer of Landon Thomas Jr.; conducting an investigation into Saudi Royal family finances.
SAMA
Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority; mentioned as withdrawing funds.
BlackRock
Mentioned as a firm from which Saudis might have recalled cash.
Abraaj
Private equity firm; Thomas references a story he wrote about them.
Pentagon
Mentioned by Epstein regarding US power structure.
CIA
Mentioned by Epstein regarding US power structure.
State Department
Mentioned by Epstein regarding US power structure.
Congress
Mentioned by Epstein regarding US power structure.

Timeline (1 events)

October 2016
NYT Investigation into Saudi Royal Family finances
New York

Locations (6)

Location Context
Subject of the discussion.
USA
Subject of political commentary by Epstein.
Mentioned regarding real estate.
Mentioned regarding real estate.
Mentioned regarding real estate.
Mentioned in political context.

Relationships (2)

Landon Thomas Jr. Journalist/Source Jeffrey Epstein
Thomas asks Epstein for insights on a story and contacts; Thomas explicitly asks Epstein to facilitate a meeting with Bill Gates.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate Bill Gates
Thomas implies Epstein has the ability to arrange a meeting with Gates ('does my story... get me a meeting with Gates').

Key Quotes (5)

"PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg
Quote #1
"CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg
Quote #2
"trump has tapped in."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg
Quote #3
"it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg
Quote #4
"unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty... it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,542 characters)

From: Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED]
Sent: 10/19/2016 1:42:43 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Saudi money
Importance: High
Too high? Too low?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:42 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
no
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years,
social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.
with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to?
I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London.
Any thoughts?
PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)
--
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031498

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document