This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kane by Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a document describing a student as a 'self-employed interior decorator' who is represented by an agent. Defense attorney Mr. Rohrbach objects to the agent's name being read aloud, arguing lack of relevance, and the Court sustains the objection, instructing the jury to look at the document themselves instead.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kane | Witness |
Subject of cross-examination (indicated by header 'Kane - Cross')
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Conducting the questioning of the witness
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Defense) |
Objects to reading a name out loud
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings and ruling on objections
|
| Unnamed Student | Subject of Document |
Described as a self-employed interior decorator
|
| Unnamed Agent | Agent |
Represented the student; name was objected to and not read aloud
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330 and Southern District Reporters
|
"It says self-employed."Source
"Yes, interior decorator."Source
"Your Honor, we object to reading this name out loud. There's no particular relevance for it."Source
"You don't have to read the name into the record, but do you see the name of the agent?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,206 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document