Kane
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Kane regarding a school's student record retention policies. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness Kane regarding a school's record-keeping and information verificati... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Direct examination | Direct examination of witness Kane regarding the record-keeping practices of the Professional Chi... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Kane regarding the authentication of Government Exhibit 761, an enr... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell) during the direct examination of wit... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court transcript document. | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017893.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kane by Ms. Menninger. The questioning concerns a document describing a student as a 'self-employed interior decorator' who is represented by an agent. Defense attorney Mr. Rohrbach objects to the agent's name being read aloud, arguing lack of relevance, and the Court sustains the objection, instructing the jury to look at the document themselves instead.
DOJ-OGR-00017890.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a document. An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against an objection from defense counsel, stating that the document qualifies as an 'adoptive business record' of a school because it was integrated into their files and relied upon, despite a witness's testimony questioning its reliability. The judge ultimately overrules the objection, allowing the document into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017889.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting a sidebar objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues against the admissibility of a school record, comparing it to a police report with third-party hearsay, specifically regarding a form that lists Jeffrey Epstein as 'financially responsible' for a student referred to as 'Jane'. The defense argues it is unclear who wrote Epstein's name on the form (Jane or her mother) and challenges the reliability of that specific information.
DOJ-OGR-00017888.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It captures a brief exchange during the direct examination of a witness named Kane, where attorney Ms. Menninger raises an objection citing Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) (Business Records Exception). The Judge acknowledges the objection and allows counsel to approach the sidebar to make a record of the argument.
DOJ-OGR-00017886.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kane. The questioning establishes that the school associated with the witness does not have knowledge of or a way to verify the accuracy of information on a specific form, including details about student referrals, financial responsibility, and who paid for the student's attendance. The witness repeatedly confirms their lack of knowledge and the school's lack of relevant records.
DOJ-OGR-00017884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records the direct examination of a witness, Kane, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, regarding the authentication of an enrollment application for the Professional Children's School, marked as Government Exhibit 761. An opposing attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on the grounds of hearsay, but the court overrules the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00017883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Kane. Kane describes a school's student record retention policy, stating that transcripts and recommendation letters are kept permanently, while other documents are typically shredded after six to seven years. Kane also admits that this purging process was not always consistently applied to older files.
DOJ-OGR-00017882.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kane. Kane describes the record-keeping practices of the Professional Children's School, explaining how student permanent files are created and what they contain. The witness states that records are now maintained electronically but were kept as hard copy files in the 1990s and up until about ten years ago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025589.jpg
An email thread from April 2018 involving Robert Trivers, Alan Rogers, and Jeffrey Epstein, along with a large CC list of prominent academics, scientists, and investors. The content is a high-level scientific discussion regarding evolutionary biology, specifically gene duplication, subfunctionalization, and sickle cell traits/malaria. Epstein is included as a direct recipient using the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
Student permanent file maintenance practices at the Profe...
A witness named Kane is questioned about the creation and maintenance of student permanent files at the Professional Children's School. Kane describes the contents of the files and explains that they are now maintained electronically in an archive, whereas they were kept as hard files until about ten years prior to the testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity