HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866.jpg

2.42 MB

Extraction Summary

0
People
1
Organizations
13
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Report / geopolitical analysis (house oversight committee document)
File Size: 2.42 MB
Summary

This document is page 33 of a larger report stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a geopolitical analysis of Israel, detailing its strategic importance to European and Eastern powers and analyzing its internal geographic divisions (Coastal, Northeast/Hill Country, and Southern Desert). It draws parallels between these geographic regions and the historical social types (merchants, warriors, herdsmen) that inhabit them.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Identified via footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866'

Timeline (2 events)

Historical Antiquity
Conquest of northern Israel by Assyrians
Northern Israel
Israel Assyrians
Historical Antiquity
Conquest of Judea by Babylon
Judea

Relationships (2)

Coastal Plain Inhabitants Economic Eastern Trade Routes
Its coastal plain facilitates commerce, serving as the interface between eastern trade routes and the sea.
Israel (Northern Kingdom) Historical Division Judea
In the division of the original kingdom between Israel and Judea...

Key Quotes (3)

"Jerusalem is where these three regions are balanced and governed."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866.jpg
Quote #1
"Of these, the European power and the eastern power must be the most concerned with Israel. For either, there is no choice but to secure it as an anchor."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866.jpg
Quote #2
"The coastal dwellers, rich but less warlike than the others, hold the balance or are the prize to be pursued."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,912 characters)

33
of the Eastern Hemisphere. A European power trying to dominate the
Mediterranean or expand eastward, an eastern power trying to
dominate the space between the Hindu Kush and the Mediterranean,
a North African power moving toward the east, or a northern power
moving south — all must converge on the eastern coast of the
Mediterranean and therefore on Israel. Of these, the European power
and the eastern power must be the most concerned with Israel. For
either, there is no choice but to secure it as an anchor.
Internal Geopolitics
Israel is geographically divided into three regions, which traditionally
have produced three different types of people. Its coastal plain
facilitates commerce, serving as the interface between eastern trade
routes and the sea. It is the home of merchants and manufacturers,
cosmopolitans — not as cosmopolitan as Phoenicia or Lebanon, but
cosmopolitan for Israel. The northeast is hill country, closest to the
unruliness north of the Litani River and to the Syrian threat. It breeds
farmers and warriors. The area south of Jerusalem is hard desert
country, more conducive to herdsman and warriors than anything
else. Jerusalem is where these three regions are balanced and
governed.
There are obviously deep differences built into Israel's geography and
inhabitants, particularly between the herdsmen of the southern deserts
and the northern hill dwellers. The coastal dwellers, rich but less
warlike than the others, hold the balance or are the prize to be
pursued. In the division of the original kingdom between Israel and
Judea, we saw the alliance of the coast with the Galilee, while
Jerusalem was held by the desert dwellers. The consequence of the
division was that Israel in the north ultimately was conquered by
Assyrians from the northeast, while Babylon was able to swallow
Judea.
Social divisions in Israel obviously do not have to follow
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031866

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document