DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg

585 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief
File Size: 585 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022, detailing the jury selection process for the trial of Ms. Maxwell. It specifically focuses on 'Juror No. 50', listing their responses to questionnaire items 13, 25, 42, 43, and 44, wherein the juror denied being a victim of a crime or having biases that would affect impartiality under penalty of perjury. The document notes that 694 individuals originally answered the questionnaire.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror No. 50 Juror
Subject of the document; answered questionnaire questions regarding impartiality and victim history under penalty of ...
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Referenced in Question 42 regarding allegations against her.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
US District Court
Implied by case number format 1:20-cr-00330-PAE

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Prior to filing)
Jury Selection Questionnaire Process
Court
694 individuals Juror No. 50

Relationships (1)

Juror No. 50 Juror/Defendant Ms. Maxwell
Document discusses Juror No. 50's ability to be fair regarding allegations against Ms. Maxwell.

Key Quotes (3)

"Question 25: 'No,' Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg
Quote #1
"Under the penalty of perjury, Juror. No. 50 answered these questions as follows"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg
Quote #2
"Six-hundred and ninety-four individuals answered the questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,525 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 12 of 66
If a potential juror selected either "yes" option, the questionnaire asked individuals to explain their answer in writing, to state whether having been a victim of sexual assault, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment would affect their ability to serve fairly and impartially, and if so, to explain why.
Finally, Question 50 asked potential jurors if there was any experience that they had that might affect their ability to serve fairly and impartial as a juror.
Six-hundred and ninety-four individuals answered the questionnaire.
B. Juror No. 50's questionnaire
Juror No. 50's questionnaire is attached as EXHIBIT 1. Under the penalty of perjury, Juror. No. 50 answered these questions as follows:
• Question 13: "Yes," Juror No. 50 could decide the case solely based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice.
• Question 25: "No," Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime.
• Question 42: "No," there was nothing about the nature of the allegations against Ms. Maxwell that "might make it difficult" for Juror No. 50 to be fair and impartial.
• Question 43: "No," Juror No. 50 did not have any views about laws concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial.
• Question 44: "No," Juror No. 50 did not have any views about the laws governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial.
5
DOJ-OGR-00009704

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document