DOJ-OGR-00014992.jpg

515 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross examination)
File Size: 515 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, focusing on the distinction between normal parenting behaviors (providing food, education, presents) and 'grooming.' The witness testifies that grooming requires a coercive or controlling context/intent.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Being cross-examined (identified in header 'Rocchio - Cross')
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interrogator
Asking questions about parenting and grooming definitions

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in footer
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (1 events)

01/15/25
Filing date of the document containing the cross-examination testimony of witness Rocchio regarding the definition of grooming versus parenting.
Court (Southern District)
Rocchio Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on case number format and reporter name

Key Quotes (2)

"None of that would be considered grooming absent an intent to use that conduct to manipulate the child; correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014992.jpg
Quote #1
"Again, the grooming is about the coercion. So to the extent that those behaviors are not being done in a coercive, controlling context, they would not be considered grooming, correct."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014992.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,205 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 116 of 158 116
LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And a parent wants to provide for their child; correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And a parent wants their child to go to school; correct?
5 A. Usually, yes.
6 Q. And if a parent can afford for school or after-school
7 activities, the parent wants to provide for those activities;
8 correct?
9 A. Many parents, yes.
10 Q. And let's call them good parents, right, good parents want
11 their children to eat; right?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Good parents want to buy their children appropriate
14 presents; correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Good parents want everything they can get for their
17 children in a positive way; correct?
18 A. Good parents want good outcomes for their kids, yes.
19 Q. None of that would be considered grooming absent an intent
20 to use that conduct to manipulate the child; correct?
21 A. Again, the grooming is about the coercion. So to the
22 extent that those behaviors are not being done in a coercive,
23 controlling context, they would not be considered grooming,
24 correct.
25 Q. Have you had mentors in your career?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014992

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document