This document is page 108 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding a journal entry she wrote in January 1996. The questioning focuses on how hindsight affects her perception of events that occurred in New Mexico and New York, specifically referencing a 'movie theater incident' involving an unnamed male ('him').
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
Annie Farmer, under cross-examination regarding her 1996 journal and memories.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney |
Raises an objection during questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Overrules the objection.
|
| Unknown Questioner | Defense Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination (implied).
|
| Him | Subject |
Referenced in line 15 ('happened again with him'), likely referring to Epstein or an associate.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by the questioner regarding events that happened to the witness.
|
|
|
Mentioned by the witness regarding where events happened to her.
|
"And your memories today are colored by hindsight; correct?"Source
"Does that affect how I perceive what happened to me in New York?"Source
"Because what may not have seemed weird in one moment, if it happened again with him, may become weirder, right?"Source
"In your journal entry, after describing the movie theater incident, you continue on to talk about mundane teen activities, right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,236 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document