DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
605 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
605 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues against admitting a topless photograph of a female subject found in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in 2019, stating the photo dates to 2002 when the subject was of age. Menninger argues that introducing the photo creates a '403 problem' (prejudice) because the prosecution will not call the subject to testify due to her 'credibility problems.'
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Arguing against the admission of a photograph and discussing the credibility of a potential witness.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding testimony and representations of a minor.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Sex Offender |
Mentioned as having possession of the photograph in question in 2019.
|
| Ms. Moe | Speaker |
Interrupted speaker in the court transcript.
|
| Unnamed Female Subject | Subject of Photograph/Potential Witness |
Subject of a topless photo taken in 2002; defense claims she has 'credibility problems' and will not testify.
|
| Menninger's Client | Defendant |
Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case 1:20-cr-00330); Menninger argues the photo establishes no relationship...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| US District Court |
Implied by 'The Court' and case number format.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (New York).
|
Relationships (2)
Epstein possessed a photo of the subject in 2019.
Defense argues the photo does not establish a relationship between the client and the subject.
Key Quotes (4)
"It's something that was in the possession of Jeffrey Epstein in 2019, and it was taken by any available data in 2002 when she was above the age of consent."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
Quote #1
"I think the 403 problem looms large in this case where we're going to put in a photograph of someone who there is not going to be -- she's not going to testify, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
Quote #2
"They don't want her to testify because she has a lot of credibility problems."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
Quote #3
"So now they want to get in evidence that she had a topless photo and no one's going to say when that photograph was taken."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,530 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 255 of 261 1416
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
1 the exact date because there are limitations on digital
2 forensics.
3 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the representation was
4 just made that this person was a minor victim, and that
5 representation has been made to this Court on previous
6 indications.
7 THE COURT: Based on the testimony, I don't think the
8 representation was that the picture represented her as a minor.
9 MS. MOE: --
10 MS. MENNINGER: -- nature of the relationship. I
11 think the quote just was between my client and her and
12 Mr. Epstein. There is nothing about this photograph that
13 establishes any relationship having to do anything with my
14 client. It's something that was in the possession of Jeffrey
15 Epstein in 2019, and it was taken by any available data in 2002
16 when she was above the age of consent.
17 I think the 403 problem looms large in this case where
18 we're going to put in a photograph of someone who there is not
19 going to be -- she's not going to testify, your Honor. They
20 don't want her to testify because she has a lot of credibility
21 problems. So they want to put in evidence that she was a
22 victim but without having her get on the stand and testify. So
23 now they want to get in evidence that she had a topless photo
24 and no one's going to say when that photograph was taken. The
25 available evidence on the photo is that it was taken when she
2 forensics.
3 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the representation was
4 just made that this person was a minor victim, and that
5 representation has been made to this Court on previous
6 indications.
7 THE COURT: Based on the testimony, I don't think the
8 representation was that the picture represented her as a minor.
9 MS. MOE: --
10 MS. MENNINGER: -- nature of the relationship. I
11 think the quote just was between my client and her and
12 Mr. Epstein. There is nothing about this photograph that
13 establishes any relationship having to do anything with my
14 client. It's something that was in the possession of Jeffrey
15 Epstein in 2019, and it was taken by any available data in 2002
16 when she was above the age of consent.
17 I think the 403 problem looms large in this case where
18 we're going to put in a photograph of someone who there is not
19 going to be -- she's not going to testify, your Honor. They
20 don't want her to testify because she has a lot of credibility
21 problems. So they want to put in evidence that she was a
22 victim but without having her get on the stand and testify. So
23 now they want to get in evidence that she had a topless photo
24 and no one's going to say when that photograph was taken. The
25 available evidence on the photo is that it was taken when she
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018592
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document