This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 15, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting an extension of time until October 30, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102. The document indicates that the parties are working together to potentially resolve the case. It lists legal counsel for both the plaintiff (Podhurst Orseck, P.A.) and the defendant (Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman; Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Seeking extension of time to respond to complaint.
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Party suing Epstein; agreed to the extension.
|
| Robert D. Critton Jr. | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; signed the motion.
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff.
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff.
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed.
|
|
| Podhurst Orseck, P.A. |
Law firm representing the Plaintiff.
|
|
| Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm representing the Defendant.
|
|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman |
Law firm representing the Defendant.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman.
|
"The parties continue to work together to potentially resolve this case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,060 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document