| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael J. Pike
|
Correspondents involved in same case |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael J. Pike
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-12-02 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-11-16 | N/A | Motion for Extension of Time filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-10-29 | N/A | Motion for Extension of Time filed. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-10-15 | N/A | Filing of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-08-11 | N/A | Email correspondence between paralegal Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding the legal pr... | N/A (virtual communication) | View |
| 2009-08-07 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-08-06 | N/A | Email correspondence between legal staff to coordinate scheduling for the deposition of Mr. Epste... | N/A | View |
This document is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting an extension until December 15, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102. The reasons cited for the extension include ongoing resolution negotiations and questions arising from the 'implosion' of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, PA firm.
This document is an 'Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein on November 16, 2009. The motion requests an extension until November 27, 2009, for Epstein to respond to the complaint, citing that the parties are working together and are 'close to a resolution' of the case. The document includes a certificate of service listing the attorneys involved for both the plaintiff (Podhurst Orseck, P.A.) and the defendant (Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. and Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman).
This is an unopposed motion filed on October 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein requests an extension until November 16, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 102' on May 1, 2009, citing that the parties are working together to potentially resolve the case. The document lists legal counsel for both sides, including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger for Epstein, and Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell for the plaintiff.
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 15, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting an extension of time until October 30, 2009, to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 102. The document indicates that the parties are working together to potentially resolve the case. It lists legal counsel for both the plaintiff (Podhurst Orseck, P.A.) and the defendant (Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman; Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.).
This document is a Motion for Extension of Time filed on December 2, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requested an extension until December 15, 2009, to file a reply, citing ongoing settlement negotiations and the need to investigate the implications of the 'Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, PA' firm implosion on the Plaintiff's counsel. The document notes that Plaintiff's counsel opposed this extension request.
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 15, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting an extension of time until October 30, 2009, to reply to Plaintiff Jane Doe 101's response to the motion to dismiss. The motion states that the parties are working together to find a resolution to the case and that the plaintiff's counsel agrees to the extension. The document includes a procedural history of filings and a service list of attorneys involved.
This document contains a series of emails from September and August 2009 related to the 'Jane Does v. Epstein' case. Key events include confirmation that Jeffrey Epstein will not attend Jane Doe No. 4's deposition and requests by Michael J. Pike for Dr. Kliman's client questionnaires, threatening to file a motion if they are not provided promptly.
This document is an email chain from August 2009 regarding the 'Jane Doe' case, involving the law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman. The correspondence discusses scheduling conflicts between a proposed hearing on August 20th and a pre-existing deposition. Additionally, a paralegal is seeking contact information for a 'Dr. Rishard' and the 'Office of Palm Beach Doctors' mentioned by a person identified as 'LM', noting that they have been unable to locate either entity.
This document is an email thread from August 5, 2009, forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney Robert Critton. The emails discuss the status of serving legal papers to Ghislaine Maxwell, Leslie Wexner, and Donald Trump in relation to a 'Jane Doe' case. The thread confirms that Maxwell was not served, while Wexner's counsel and Trump's staff accepted service on their behalf.
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) and the office of attorney Bradley Edwards. The correspondence concerns discovery in a case involving a 'Jane Doe.' Cadwell requests a HIPAA release signature from Jane Doe to access records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on responding to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories regarding net worth).
This document is an email thread from August 2009 involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell and attorney Bradley Edwards. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release from Jane Doe to obtain records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories). A brief reply notes that Edwards is out of the office until the afternoon.
An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell forwarding correspondence to Jeffrey Epstein and his attorneys (Critton and Goldberger). The underlying conversation is between Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding scheduling updates for a matter titled 'Jane Doe.' A specific update notes that 'Trump has been moved to Sept. 24.'
This document is an email from paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) to an attorney named Brad regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release to obtain Jane Doe's records from the Department of Juvenile Justice regarding her time at the Milton Center for girls. She also requests a one-week extension for responses to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (likely Net Worth Interrogatories). The email footer contains a disclaimer stating the communication is the 'property of Jeffrey Epstein' and lists the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegals Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling a deposition for Jeffrey Epstein and confirming the signing of 'Stays.' Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Robert D. Critton Jr. are included in the correspondence loop.
An email chain from August 11, 2009, forwarded by paralegal Jessica Cadwell to Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Robert Critton Jr. The chain discusses the status of a 'Jane Doe' case, specifically inquiring if 'service on Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) has been accomplished. Jacquie Johnson confirms they are still trying to get details.
This document is a chain of forwarded emails initiated by Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) in 2008 and eventually forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to his legal team in 2010. The content includes an editorial from the Palm Beach Post titled "He was over 50. And they were girls," which criticizes the leniency of charges against Epstein regarding minors. The email chain tracks the dissemination of this article among Epstein's defense attorneys, including Alan Dershowitz, Robert Critton, and Martin Weinberg.
This document is an email chain originating from a 2008 email by Michael Reiter to a contact named Margie, discussing leaks regarding the Epstein plea deal and criticizing the Palm Beach Daily News for their editorial silence. The email contains the text of a critical 2008 Palm Beach Post editorial regarding Epstein's sentence and mansion. In 2010, Jeffrey Epstein forwarded this historic email chain to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr.
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between the legal teams representing 'Jane Doe' and 'Mr. Epstein'. The paralegal for Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, discusses obtaining her records from a Department of Juvenile Justice facility and requests an extension for interrogatories in a related matter. In response, a representative for Epstein's team requests a date for his deposition.
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, where paralegal Jessica Cadwell forwards a discussion to Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Robert D. Critton Jr. The conversation with a 'Jacquie Johnson' concerns the status of legally serving papers to 'Maxwell' in a case referred to as 'Jane Doe'. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508', is labeled 'Privileged - Redacted' and contains several blacked-out sections.
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between legal professionals discussing the 'Jane Doe' case. Paralegal Jessica Cadwell requests that attorney Bradley Edwards have his client, Jane Doe, sign a HIPAA release form to obtain her records from the Department of Juvenile Justice concerning her time at the Milton Center. Cadwell also requests a one-week extension for discovery responses in a separate matter involving 'Net Wirth'.
This document is an email from paralegal Jessica Cadwell to an individual named Brad, concerning a legal matter involving 'Jane Doe'. Cadwell requests that Brad have Jane Doe sign a HIPAA release to obtain her records from the Department of Juvenile Justice for time spent at 'Milton Center for girls'. The email, which includes a confidentiality notice stating it is the property of Jeffrey Epstein, also asks for a one-week extension on 'Responses to Net Wirth ROGS'.
This document is a chain of emails from August 6, 2009, primarily between Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell, a paralegal at Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP. The correspondence, related to a case titled 'Jane Doe', discusses scheduling a deposition for 'Mr. Epstein' and mentions colleagues Bradley J. Edwards and Robert D. Critton Jr.
This document is an email chain from February 2010 in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards an old 2008 email and a critical Palm Beach Post editorial about his plea deal to members of his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr. The repeated subject line indicates Epstein was having trouble with the emails being marked as 'undeliverable'.
This document is an email chain from 2010 where Jeffrey Epstein forwards a collection of news articles about himself to his legal team, including Robert D. Critton Jr., Jessica Cadwell, Alan M. Dershowitz, and Martin Weinberg. The forwarded chain originates from a 2008 email from Michael Reiter to a 'Joyce', which contained a 2006 Palm Beach Post editorial detailing allegations that Epstein, then over 50, solicited and paid for sex with underage girls.
Electronic filing and service of the motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity