DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
580 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
580 KB
Summary
This is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and the Court discussing a dispute over redactions in a witness testimony, specifically regarding an answer that lacked a 'predicate foundation.' The Judge reads a portion of the disputed testimony which mentions individuals going 'their separate ways' and explicitly names 'Ghislaine'.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Arguing for specific redactions regarding a witness objection.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, reviewing unredacted documents to rule on a dispute.
|
| Ghislaine | Subject |
Mentioned in the testimony being read by the Court: 'Seems like Ghislaine' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell given the case c...
|
| Law Clerk | Court Staff |
Retrieving the unredacted version of the document for the Judge.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced regarding 'government's proposed redactions'.
|
|
| The Defense |
Referenced regarding 'defense's proposed redactions'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding redaction disputes in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the court reporter and phone number area code (212).
|
Relationships (2)
Speaker for the government's view.
Testimony read by judge: 'Seems like Ghislaine...'
Key Quotes (3)
"They just kind of went their separate ways."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
Quote #1
"Seems like Ghislaine"Source
DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
Quote #2
"the government's view is the objection was to the whole question, that there had not been a predicate foundation to confirm a basis of knowledge"Source
DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,453 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 777 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 13 3173
LCT1MAXT
LCT1MAXT
1 We have two prepared versions. Really, the dispute is
2 over one set of redactions. I'm happy to pass that up to the
3 Court with both the government's proposed redactions and the
4 defense's proposed redactions and indicate where the dispute
5 lies.
6 THE COURT: Okay. I'll hear from you.
7 I don't have the unredacted version right in front of
8 me, so I see the difference in the redactions, but --
9 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor. I think the dispute
10 is on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, and the government's view is
11 the objection was to the whole question, that there had not
12 been a predicate foundation to confirm a basis of knowledge,
13 and so I think our view is the whole response should be
14 redacted because the objection was sustained, and so I don't
15 see how a partial answer --
16 THE COURT: I need the unredacted version. My law
17 clerk is getting it for me.
18 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
19 (Pause)
20 THE COURT: Right. So the issue here is that it's an
21 answer that's being objected to and not a question. The answer
22 has three parts to it. So the first part is, "They just kind
23 of went their separate ways." The question "How so?" is not
24 objected to, so that stays, at the least. The answer, "They
25 just kind of went their separate ways. Seems like Ghislaine
2 over one set of redactions. I'm happy to pass that up to the
3 Court with both the government's proposed redactions and the
4 defense's proposed redactions and indicate where the dispute
5 lies.
6 THE COURT: Okay. I'll hear from you.
7 I don't have the unredacted version right in front of
8 me, so I see the difference in the redactions, but --
9 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor. I think the dispute
10 is on page 2370, lines 14 to 18, and the government's view is
11 the objection was to the whole question, that there had not
12 been a predicate foundation to confirm a basis of knowledge,
13 and so I think our view is the whole response should be
14 redacted because the objection was sustained, and so I don't
15 see how a partial answer --
16 THE COURT: I need the unredacted version. My law
17 clerk is getting it for me.
18 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
19 (Pause)
20 THE COURT: Right. So the issue here is that it's an
21 answer that's being objected to and not a question. The answer
22 has three parts to it. So the first part is, "They just kind
23 of went their separate ways." The question "How so?" is not
24 objected to, so that stays, at the least. The answer, "They
25 just kind of went their separate ways. Seems like Ghislaine
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014740
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document