Law Clerk
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00032789.pdf
This document is an email dated April 16, 2021, from a Law Clerk for Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to the defense counsel (Cohen Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Sternheim) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v Maxwell (20-cr-330). The email serves to distribute an attached court order which was about to be entered into the public docket. The document marks a procedural step in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008248.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript filed on December 8, 2021, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a discussion between the Court and defense attorney Ms. Menninger regarding the classification of prospective jurors 226 and 404. The judge outlines the logistics for voir dire, planning to call back 231 prospective jurors in groups of 50 per day to seat a final qualified pool of 50 to 60.
DOJ-OGR-00016727.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Menninger expresses concern that the government's rebuttal might become a second closing argument and requests the court enforce a rule to limit its scope. In response, attorney Ms. Comey assures the judge that the rebuttal will be significantly shorter than the closing, adhering to the standard practice in the district, a position the court affirms.
DOJ-OGR-00009100.jpg
This document is page 128 (filed on 02/24/22) of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It records Judge Nathan dismissing Juror No. 49 and beginning the questioning of Juror No. 50. The judge instructs Juror No. 50 on the presumption of innocence for Ms. Maxwell and strictly prohibits consuming media related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
This is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and the Court discussing a dispute over redactions in a witness testimony, specifically regarding an answer that lacked a 'predicate foundation.' The Judge reads a portion of the disputed testimony which mentions individuals going 'their separate ways' and explicitly names 'Ghislaine'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity