DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg

488 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (sentencing memorandum/government submission)
File Size: 488 KB
Summary

This document is page 54 of a Government sentencing submission in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 22, 2022. The text argues for the imposition of a maximum $750,000 fine, notes that no forfeiture is sought due to a lack of identified property owned by the defendant used in the offense, and states that no restitution is sought because the six identified victims (Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) have already been compensated via the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund or civil settlements.

People (8)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Subject of the sentencing/fine discussion (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Jane Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation
Annie Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation
Kate Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation
Carolyn Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation
Virginia Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation (Virginia Giuffre)
Melissa Victim
Identified at trial; received compensation
Jeffrey Epstein Co-conspirator
Mentioned regarding 'defendant's and Epstein's crimes'

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
The Government
Prosecution/DOJ submitting the filing
The Court
Judicial body overseeing the case
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
Source of funds for victims
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

Prior to 2022-06-22
Trial
Court

Relationships (2)

Defendant Criminal Associates Jeffrey Epstein
Reference to 'defendant's and Epstein's crimes'
Defendant Perpetrator/Victim Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, Melissa
Harms caused to them by the defendant’s criminal conduct

Key Quotes (4)

"A $750,000 fine will hardly impact her financial outlook, but it is the most the law will allow in this case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government is not seeking to forfeit any property because the Government has not identified specific property used in the offense conduct that the defendant herself owned."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg
Quote #2
"Each of the six victims identified at trial—Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa—has received funds from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and/or civil settlements"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg
Quote #3
"Accordingly, there is no legal basis for restitution in this case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010589.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,283 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 670 Filed 06/22/22 Page 54 of 55
the multiple millions of dollars. A $750,000 fine will hardly impact her financial outlook, but it
is the most the law will allow in this case. The Court should impose it without hesitation.
With respect to forfeiture, the Government is not seeking to forfeit any property because
the Government has not identified specific property used in the offense conduct that the defendant
herself owned.
Finally, because each of the identified victims has already received monetary compensation
for the harms caused to them by the defendant’s criminal conduct, the Government does not seek
restitution in this case. Restitution is not available where victims have received compensation for
their losses from another source. Each of the six victims identified at trial—Jane, Annie, Kate,
Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa—has received funds from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
and/or civil settlements as compensation for the harms they suffered as a result of the defendant’s
and Epstein’s crimes. The Government is not aware of any otherwise recoverable losses for which
these victims have not received monetary compensation. Accordingly, there is no legal basis for
restitution in this case.
52
DOJ-OGR-00010589

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document