DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg

592 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (appellate brief)
File Size: 592 KB
Summary

This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, arguing on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text contends that Maxwell is being subjected to cruel punishment despite being innocent, asserting the government's evidence is weak hearsay and that she is being used as a 'scapegoat' due to the public outrage surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody (referred to as the 'Epstein Effect').

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Described as innocent, not a convicted felon, and a "scapegoat" for the government following Epstein's death.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Associate
Mentioned regarding his "inexplicable death" in custody and the resulting "Epstein Effect" affecting Maxwell's treatm...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Bureau of Prisons
Accused of placing Maxwell on suicide watch because Epstein died on their watch.
The Government / Prosecutors
Accused of having weak evidence and charging Maxwell due to public outrage.
District Court
Mentioned regarding its exhortations on the strength of evidence.
The Media
Described as being in an "absolute frenzy."

Timeline (2 events)

Prior to 2021-04-01
Death of Jeffrey Epstein
Government Custody
Prior to 2021-04-01
Placement of Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch
Prison/Jail

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal/Public Perception Jeffrey Epstein
Document claims Maxwell is being used as a 'scapegoat' for the 'inexplicable death' of Epstein.

Key Quotes (5)

"Ms. Maxwell is not one [a convicted felon]. She is innocent unless and until she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
Quote #1
"the truth is that the government’s so-called “evidence,” though voluminous, is palpably weak."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
Quote #2
"It consists of anonymous, untested hearsay accusations about events that are alleged to have occurred decades ago"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
Quote #3
"The “Epstein Effect” clouded the judgment of the prosecutors into charging Ms. Maxwell because it needed a scapegoat"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
Quote #4
"the Bureau of Prisons into putting Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch because Epstein died on their watch"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,198 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page4 of 31
These conditions would support a complaint for cruel and unusual
punishment for a convicted felon. Ms. Maxwell is not one. She is
innocent unless and until she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt – an event which is highly unlikely given the lack of evidence
against her.
Despite the district court’s exhortations regarding the strength of
the evidence against Ms. Maxwell, the truth is that the government’s
so-called “evidence,” though voluminous, is palpably weak. It consists
of anonymous, untested hearsay accusations about events that are
alleged to have occurred decades ago, accusations which only surfaced
when the government faced public outrage over the inexplicable death
of Jeffrey Epstein, while in their custody.
The “Epstein Effect” clouded the judgment of the prosecutors into
charging Ms. Maxwell because it needed a scapegoat, the Bureau of
Prisons into putting Ms. Maxwell on suicide watch because Epstein died
on their watch, the media into an absolute frenzy, and many other fair-
minded people into viewing Ms. Maxwell as guilty even though no
evidence has been presented against her.
2
DOJ-OGR-00019832

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document