the government
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00008278.jpg
This is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 533) from the US v. Maxwell case, filed on December 9, 2021. The text argues for the authenticity of Government Exhibit 52 (a contact book seized from Alfredo Rodriguez), citing Juan Alessi's testimony and the defendant's own admission in a 2016 deposition that she recognized the 'actual document,' despite claiming it was stolen. The document asserts the book belonged to both Epstein and the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00001078.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (part of an appellate filing for Case 21-770) where a government prosecutor argues against bail for a female defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecutor asserts that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not bind the current office or shield the defendant. Arguments for detention include the defendant's extensive international ties, unknown finances, and lack of candor regarding resources.
DOJ-OGR-00000962.jpg
This document is a page from a legal defense filing arguing against the pre-trial detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship since 1991 and strong family ties in the US to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. The defense disputes the government's claim that she was 'hiding,' asserting she was in regular contact with authorities through counsel since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00016904.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Jeffrey Epstein's lease violations and residency at a specific property in late 1995 and early 1996. She references a witness hired in December 1995 who confirmed Epstein was not living at the property for the first three weeks of his employment.
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
This document is page 74 of a court transcript from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 10, 2020. A government prosecutor is arguing before the judge that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not protect the defendant (Maxwell) and asserting that the agreement does not bind the current office. The prosecutor further argues against bail, citing the defendant's extensive international ties, unknown finances, and lack of candor regarding resources to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, arguing on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text contends that Maxwell is being subjected to cruel punishment despite being innocent, asserting the government's evidence is weak hearsay and that she is being used as a 'scapegoat' due to the public outrage surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody (referred to as the 'Epstein Effect').
DOJ-OGR-00010579.jpg
This document is a page from the Government's sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 22, 2022. The text accuses the defendant of lying to the Court about her guilt, refusing to disclose details about her marriage to the Probation Office, and drastically altering her reported net worth from $22 million (during bail hearings) to almost nothing (during sentencing). The Government argues that Maxwell accepts no responsibility and instead falsely portrays herself as a victim of various entities, including her father, Epstein, and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00004790.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 307) by the Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 25, 2021. The text argues that the Government did not violate Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights by obtaining and using her deposition transcripts from a previous civil case. It cites Second Circuit precedent to establish that civil protective orders do not guarantee protection against the use of testimony in subsequent criminal prosecutions.
DOJ-OGR-00004786.jpg
This page from a 2021 court filing details a February 29, 2016, meeting between the Government (AUSA) and Virginia Giuffre's attorneys, where Maxwell was identified as Epstein's 'head recruiter.' It discusses a protective order issued shortly after that meeting which prevented the sharing of discovery documents with law enforcement without a court order. It also addresses a dispute regarding an alleged second meeting in the summer of 2016, which the Government denies occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00005848.jpg
This legal filing details the government's interactions with Minor Victim-4, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) between 2001 and 2004. It highlights that the defendant personally paid the victim following sexual encounters with Epstein and outlines the victim's interviews with the FBI in 2007 and prosecutors in 2020 and 2021. The document also mentions a photo identification procedure conducted in June 2021.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity