DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
352 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (criminal case)
File Size:
352 KB
Summary
This document is page 156 of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues that a jury should decide if the defendant lied, rejecting the defendant's claims that her answers were truthful. It introduces 'Count Six,' which charges the defendant with perjury related to a 'second deposition' that occurred in July 2016, though the specific transcripts of that deposition are redacted on this page.
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00003090.
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by the case filing header.
|
Relationships (1)
The text argues that the defendant's defenses should be rejected and that she lied.
Key Quotes (3)
"A properly instructed jury could conclude after hearing all of the evidence at trial that the defendant intended the natural meaning of the words she used, not the allegedly truthful answer she suggests now, and therefore that she lied."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #1
"In sum, the defendant’s post-hoc efforts to inject confusion into clear questioning are unavailing and should be rejected, and the jury should decide whether the defendant’s answers were false."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #2
"Count Six charges the defendant with perjury arising from three colloquies at the second deposition."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (770 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 156 of 239
denial . . .”). A properly instructed jury could conclude after hearing all of the evidence at trial
that the defendant intended the natural meaning of the words she used, not the allegedly truthful
answer she suggests now, and therefore that she lied. In sum, the defendant’s post-hoc efforts to
inject confusion into clear questioning are unavailing and should be rejected, and the jury should
decide whether the defendant’s answers were false.
that the defendant intended the natural meaning of the words she used, not the allegedly truthful
answer she suggests now, and therefore that she lied. In sum, the defendant’s post-hoc efforts to
inject confusion into clear questioning are unavailing and should be rejected, and the jury should
decide whether the defendant’s answers were false.
2. July 2016 Deposition
Count Six charges the defendant with perjury arising from three colloquies at the second
deposition.
deposition.
[REDACTED BLOCK]
Following that line of questioning, the following
colloquy occurred:
colloquy occurred:
[REDACTED BLOCK]
129
DOJ-OGR-00003090
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document