DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg

642 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (summation)
File Size: 642 KB
Summary

This document is page 126 of a court transcript from the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the witness 'Kate' is unreliable because she claimed to meet Maxwell at a specific house (44 Kinnerton Street) in 1994, but property records show Maxwell did not purchase that home until March 1997. The defense dismisses a 2019 deposition where Maxwell claimed to live there earlier as an 'offhand remark' made without documentation.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Delivering closing summation arguments.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the trial; ownership of her homes is being disputed.
Kate Witness/Accuser
Testified she met Maxwell in 1994 at a specific house; defense is impeaching her timeline.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Nags Head Pub
Located across from the house Kate described.

Timeline (3 events)

1994
Witness 'Kate' claims she met Ghislaine Maxwell at a house with a red door.
Allegedly 44 Kinnerton Street (disputed by defense)
2019
Ghislaine Maxwell gave testimony under oath in a separate property dispute.
Unknown
March 1997
Ghislaine Maxwell purchased the home at 44 Kinnerton Street.
44 Kinnerton Street

Locations (3)

Location Context
The 'house with the red door' across from Nags Head Pub. Purchased by Maxwell in 1997.
Home owned by Maxwell prior to 1997.
Landmark used to identify the Kinnerton Street property.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Accuser/Defendant Kate
Kate testified about meeting Maxwell; Defense is attempting to impeach Kate's timeline.

Key Quotes (4)

"Kate was firm that that's the address she went to, the house with the red door."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg
Quote #1
"Ghislaine Maxwell didn't own that home until 1997, not 1994."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg
Quote #2
"If it happened at all, it happened three years after Kate said it happened."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg
Quote #3
"She didn't have any documents in front of her."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,655 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 126 of 257 2960
LCKVMAX6 Summation - Ms. Menninger
1 she met Ghislaine in 1994, when she was younger than 17. And
2 so Kate was firm that that's the address she went to, the house
3 with the red door. It's actually Government Exhibit 702. So
4 when you see that house, you'll know that's the one that Kate
5 was talking about. It's across from something called The Nags
6 Head Pub.
7 But the problem is Ghislaine Maxwell didn't own that
8 home until 1997, not 1994. She owned that home when Kate was
9 20 years old, not 16 years old, not 17 years old. You will see
10 those exhibits, A-5 -- and A-5 refers you to MG-12 and MG-1.
11 And what these show is that Ghislaine Maxwell owned a home,
12 another home, at 69 Stanhope Mews; and that she sold that home,
13 and then she bought the next home at 44 Kinnerton Street. And
14 the purchase of that home, purchased from another family,
15 occurred in March of 1997, when Kate was 20 years old. So the
16 entire story about going to that home and there being a massage
17 room in that roam at Kinnerton Street is just wrong. If it
18 happened at all, it happened three years after Kate said it
19 happened.
20 Now, the government showed you an offhand remark made
21 in another property dispute from 2019 that Ghislaine Maxwell
22 gave under oath when it was talking about a totally different
23 property. And they asked her in 2019, When did you start
24 living at Kinnerton Street? And she said, 92, '93. She didn't
25 have any documents in front of her. And she's talking about a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014526

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document